222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Wednesday, 20 November 2024

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Dangerous Plant: Understanding the Risks of Poppies

Poppies, particularly those in the Papaver genus, are often admired for their delicate, colorful flowers and their historic association with remembrance. However, lurking behind their beauty is a darker story of danger and harm. While not all poppies are lethal, certain species pose significant risks to humans and animals due to their toxic properties and association with narcotics.

Toxic Components of Poppies

Many poppy species, including the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum), contain alkaloids such as morphine, codeine, and thebaine. These compounds have medicinal applications but can be toxic when consumed improperly. Ingesting unprocessed parts of the plant, such as seeds, sap, or capsules, can lead to symptoms ranging from nausea and dizziness to severe respiratory distress or death.

Children and pets are particularly vulnerable, as even small amounts can result in poisoning. For example, the milky latex sap found in poppy seed pods contains concentrated alkaloids that can be harmful if touched or ingested.

The Opium Connection

The opium poppy is infamous for its role in producing narcotics. Opium, extracted from the sap, is a precursor for drugs such as heroin and morphine. While these substances have legitimate medical uses, their misuse has contributed to addiction crises worldwide. This association has also made poppy cultivation a contentious issue in regions like Afghanistan, where illegal opium trade funds criminal networks and insurgencies.

Wild Poppies and Livestock Poisoning

Beyond the opium poppy, other species, like the field poppy (Papaver rhoeas), are toxic to livestock. Ingesting poppies in large quantities can cause poisoning in animals, leading to symptoms like lethargy, muscle tremors, and, in severe cases, death. Farmers are often cautious about allowing poppies to proliferate in grazing fields.

Poppy Seeds: Harmless or Harmful

Poppy seeds, a common ingredient in baking, are generally safe for consumption as they are processed to remove toxic alkaloids. However, unwashed or contaminated seeds can still pose risks. Consuming large quantities may lead to unexpected side effects, including sedation and gastrointestinal distress. Additionally, poppy seed ingestion can sometimes cause false positives in drug tests, raising concerns for individuals in sensitive occupations.

Prevention and Awareness

To mitigate risks, individuals should educate themselves on the characteristics of dangerous poppy species and avoid handling or consuming wild plants. Parents and pet owners should ensure that poppies are not accessible to curious hands or paws.

For gardeners, cultivating poppies may require careful planning, particularly in regions with strict laws regulating opium poppy growth. While ornamental poppies can enhance a garden’s beauty, the potential risks should not be overlooked.

Conclusion

The poppy is a plant of duality: a symbol of peace and sacrifice but also a source of danger and destruction. While its medicinal and cultural significance cannot be understated, understanding the risks associated with poppies is essential for safeguarding public health. By respecting its potential dangers, we can appreciate the poppy’s place in history and nature without falling victim to its hidden perils.

Attached is a news article regarding the most dangerous plant in the world poppy

https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/13/afghanistan-record-opium-crop-poppies-un

Article written and configured by smileband

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Liam Payne Laid to Rest in Heartfelt Ceremony

On November 20, 2024, family, friends, and fans gathered to bid farewell to Liam Payne at a private funeral held in Amersham, England. The service featured poignant tributes, including floral arrangements symbolizing his roles as a father and son. His One Direction bandmates attended alongside celebrities like Cheryl Tweedy, Kate Cassidy, and James Corden.

Payne tragically passed away in Buenos Aires in October 2024, with investigations ongoing. His funeral underscored his impact on music and the enduring love of those closest to him.

• Date and Location: Liam Payne’s funeral took place on November 20, 2024, in Amersham, England.

• Attendance: One Direction members, Cheryl Tweedy, Kate Cassidy, James Corden, and other close friends and family attended.

• Tributes: Floral arrangements included “daddy” and “son,” symbolizing his family connections. His coffin was brought in a horse-drawn carriage.

• Context: Payne passed away in October 2024 in Argentina under tragic circumstances, with an investigation still ongoing.

• Legacy: The ceremony highlighted his impact on loved ones and fans.

The ceremony ended with heartfelt tributes, as attendees reflected on Liam Payne’s life, achievements, and the love he inspired in family, friends, and fans worldwide. His memory was honored with personal touches and the support of those who cherished him most.

Attached is a news article regarding Liam Payne funeral

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy7d2k41l6vo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

British Warships, Helicopters, and Drones Set for Decommissioning Amid Cost-Cutting Measures

In a controversial move to address budgetary pressures, the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) has announced plans to decommission a range of military assets, including warships, helicopters, and drones. The decision, which comes as part of a broader cost-cutting initiative, has sparked criticism from defence experts and political leaders concerned about the potential impact on national security.

Key Assets to Be Scrapped

The MoD has confirmed that several warships from the Royal Navy’s aging fleet will be retired earlier than anticipated. This includes some of the Type 23 frigates, which have served as the backbone of the fleet for anti-submarine and general-purpose operations. While newer Type 26 frigates are set to replace them, delays in their production could leave gaps in operational capacity.

In addition, several Chinook and Puma helicopters, vital for troop transport and search-and-rescue missions, are expected to be phased out. These aircraft, some of which have been in service for decades, are costly to maintain and have been deemed unsustainable under the current budget constraints.

The MoD is also scaling back its fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Some older drone models, used primarily for reconnaissance and intelligence gathering, will be retired as part of the cuts. Critics argue this could undermine the UK’s ability to maintain a technological edge in modern warfare.

Rationale Behind the Cuts

The cost-cutting measures come as the UK grapples with economic challenges, including inflation and the rising cost of defence procurement. The MoD has faced mounting pressure to balance its budget while investing in modernising the armed forces.

An MoD spokesperson stated:

“These decisions are never easy, but they are necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability and efficiency of our armed forces. We remain committed to investing in cutting-edge technology and maintaining our operational readiness.”

Criticism and Concerns

The announcement has drawn significant backlash from military analysts and politicians. Former First Sea Lord Admiral Sir Philip Jones warned that reducing naval assets could compromise the UK’s ability to project power globally and protect vital trade routes.

Defence experts have also highlighted the risks of reducing helicopter capacity, particularly during international crises or domestic emergencies. The scaling back of UAVs has raised alarms about the UK’s ability to conduct effective surveillance and counter-terrorism operations.

Opposition parties have called for greater transparency in the decision-making process. Shadow Defence Secretary John Healey remarked:

“These cuts send the wrong message at a time when global threats are increasing. The government must ensure that these measures do not leave our armed forces underprepared.”

Looking Ahead

The MoD has pledged to reinvest savings into modern technologies, including the development of autonomous systems and artificial intelligence in defence. However, there are concerns about the timeline and feasibility of these advancements, particularly if gaps in capability emerge in the interim.

As the UK seeks to balance fiscal responsibility with national security, the decommissioning of warships, helicopters, and drones highlights the difficult trade-offs faced by the defence sector. Whether these measures will achieve the intended cost savings without compromising military effectiveness remains to be seen.

Attached is a news article regarding the cost cutting measure made by the military

https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-scraps-older-warships-helicopters-and-drones-in-cost-saving-plan/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Boy Who Climbed the Shard: George King’s Remarkable Story

In July 2019, George King, a 19-year-old from Oxford, captured global attention when he scaled London’s iconic Shard without ropes or safety equipment. Standing at 310 meters, the Shard is the UK’s tallest building, making King’s audacious climb both a daring feat and a controversial act.

This stunt, inspired by his fascination with the building from a young age, earned him widespread acclaim but also led to legal consequences.

King’s ascent was meticulously planned, but it resulted in a four-month prison sentence for trespassing. Despite this, his story of resilience and fearlessness resonated with many.

Over time, King transformed his narrative from one of risk-taking to empowerment, becoming a motivational speaker and advocate for mental resilience.

He speaks about managing fear, embracing neurodiversity, and redefining personal limits, drawing from his experiences of climbing urban structures and his personal journey with ADHD.

The climb was featured in the Channel 4 documentary The Boy Who Climbed the Shard, which highlights his motivations and the challenges he faced during and after the ascent.

The documentary gained significant traction, reflecting both the awe and controversy surrounding his actions.

Today, King continues to inspire as a keynote speaker, sharing lessons from his extreme sports adventures and encouraging others to overcome their fears and embrace challenges in their own lives.

For more details on George King’s story, his achievements, and his motivational work, check out his profile on or the Channel 4 documentary.

Attached is a news article regarding the boy who climbed the shard

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/free-climber-filmed-scaling-1-000ft-shard-as-police-called-to-scene-11758733

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Church Abuse Scandal: John Smith and the Call for Accountability

In a shocking revelation, the name John Smith has become synonymous with a growing scandal that continues to shake the foundations of trust in the Church. Allegations of abuse spanning decades have surfaced, implicating Smith, a prominent figure within his local diocese, in what many are calling one of the most egregious breaches of trust in recent memory.

The accusations against Smith, a former priest who held significant influence in his community, first came to light earlier this year when several survivors came forward with their harrowing accounts. The allegations range from inappropriate conduct to serious abuse, dating back to the 1980s. Victims have described how Smith used his position of authority and the Church’s protective systems to silence complaints and avoid accountability.

A Systemic Problem

While the allegations against Smith are shocking, they are part of a broader, systemic issue that has plagued the Church for years. Critics argue that the institution’s hierarchical structure and emphasis on preserving its reputation have often enabled abusers to act with impunity. Investigations into Smith’s case have revealed repeated failures by the Church to address concerns raised by victims, with some reports suggesting that complaints were dismissed or buried by senior officials.

Survivors Speak Out

One survivor, speaking anonymously, described the emotional toll of coming forward. “For years, I thought no one would believe me. Smith was seen as a pillar of the community. It took immense courage to share my story, and I hope it encourages others to speak out.”

Support groups and advocacy organizations have rallied around the survivors, demanding justice and transparency. “This is not just about John Smith,” said a spokesperson for Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP). “This is about holding the Church accountable for creating an environment where predators could thrive.”

The Church’s Response

In response to the allegations, the diocese issued a statement expressing “profound sorrow” for the victims and pledging full cooperation with law enforcement. However, critics argue that such statements often ring hollow without concrete action.

Calls for an independent inquiry into Smith’s case and the Church’s handling of abuse allegations have grown louder, with activists emphasizing the need for systemic reforms to ensure transparency and accountability.

A Path Forward?

The John Smith scandal has reignited debates about how institutions can protect vulnerable members of their communities while maintaining accountability for their leaders. Legal experts have also pointed out the need to revisit statutes of limitations on abuse cases, which often prevent survivors from seeking justice years after the fact.

As the case unfolds, one thing is clear: the scandal surrounding John Smith is not just a story about one individual. It is a stark reminder of the long road ahead for institutions striving to rebuild trust, prioritize victims, and implement lasting change.

Conclusion

The revelations about John Smith are a painful reminder of the damage caused by abuse and the complicity of institutions that fail to act. For the survivors, justice is long overdue. For the Church, this is an opportunity to demonstrate that it can confront its darkest truths and emerge stronger, with a renewed commitment to safeguarding the vulnerable.

As the investigation continues, the world watches, hoping that this scandal will not fade into history as just another chapter in the Church’s troubled past but as a turning point toward genuine reform.

Attached is a news article regarding the church abuse scandal regarding John smyth

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czr74xg7805o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Roy Whiting: The Most Hated Prisoner in the UK

Roy Whiting is a name synonymous with one of the most harrowing crimes in modern British history. Convicted in 2001 for the abduction and murder of eight-year-old Sarah Payne, his actions shocked the nation and led to widespread public outrage. Over two decades later, Whiting remains one of the most reviled inmates in the UK prison system, a title cemented by the heinous nature of his crime and the lasting impact it had on Sarah’s family and society at large.

The Crime That Shook the Nation

In July 2000, Sarah Payne was playing in a field near her grandparents’ home in West Sussex when she was abducted. Her disappearance triggered a massive police investigation and a national campaign, with posters of Sarah’s face plastered across the country. Tragically, her body was discovered two weeks later in a field in West Sussex.

Whiting, a known paedophile with previous convictions, quickly became a suspect. He had been jailed in 1995 for abducting and assaulting a nine-year-old girl but was released in 1997 despite evidence of his dangerous tendencies. His van, discovered during the investigation, contained forensic evidence linking him to Sarah. In December 2001, Whiting was sentenced to life imprisonment, with the judge recommending he never be released.

Life in Prison

Whiting’s time behind bars has been marked by violence, attacks, and constant isolation. He is held under high security for his own protection, as even hardened criminals in the UK’s prison system hold an unspoken code that despises child offenders. Whiting has reportedly been assaulted multiple times, including being stabbed by other inmates.

Despite the protection measures, he lives a life of constant vigilance, knowing he is one of the most despised individuals in the system. Former prisoners have described him as a “marked man,” with some suggesting that Whiting spends most of his time in segregation to avoid attacks.

The Public’s Reaction

Whiting’s case spurred significant public anger and led to calls for harsher sentences for paedophiles. The Payne family became vocal campaigners for child safety, spearheading the introduction of “Sarah’s Law,” which allows parents to ask police if someone with access to their children has a history of child sexual offences. This law was implemented across England and Wales in 2011 and is seen as a crucial step in protecting children from predators like Whiting.

A Legacy of Hatred

Whiting’s name remains a byword for evil in the UK. His actions robbed a family of their beloved daughter and scarred a community. For many, he embodies the failures of the justice system in managing dangerous offenders, and his notoriety ensures he will likely remain one of the most hated prisoners in Britain until the end of his days.

Conclusion

The case of Roy Whiting serves as a grim reminder of the importance of safeguarding children and holding offenders accountable. While justice was served in his case, the pain and anger he caused continue to resonate, making him a symbol of society’s collective disgust for those who prey on the innocent. Whiting’s life behind bars is not just a punishment for his crimes but a reflection of a nation’s unrelenting condemnation.

Attached is a news article regarding Roy whiting the most hated prisoner in the uk

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-14001534.amp

Article written and configured y Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The UK has a significant number of bunkers, many of which date back to World War II and the Cold War era. These bunkers were built for various purposes, including air raid protection, military command centers, and nuclear fallout shelters.

There are hundreds of remnants scattered across the country, ranging from public air raid shelters and disused military sites to private bunkers. Notable examples include the Kelvedon Hatch Bunker in Essex and the PINDAR command bunker in London, which are well-documented remnants of Cold War planning. Many bunkers remain secret or inaccessible, especially those still maintained by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) for potential emergencies.

Several maps and records detail these locations, with some being repurposed for tourism or storage. In recent years, interest in bunker construction has grown due to geopolitical concerns, with private companies offering modern nuclear shelters to individuals and organizations.

For a deeper exploration, public maps and guides like those by enthusiasts at Higgypop Paranormal offer insight into the vast network of known and hidden bunkers across the UK.

Key Points About UK Bunkers:

1. Historical Context:

• Many UK bunkers were constructed during World War II and the Cold War to protect against air raids and nuclear attacks.

• They served as government command centers, radar stations, and fallout shelters.

2. Types of Bunkers:

• Public Air Raid Shelters: Built in urban areas for civilian use during WWII.

• Military Sites: Cold War bunkers for government and military purposes, including communication hubs and weapons storage.

• Modern Private Bunkers: Recently constructed shelters in response to increased geopolitical tensions, often custom-built for private clients.

3. Notable Locations:

• Kelvedon Hatch, Essex: A preserved Cold War bunker now open to the public.

• PINDAR Bunker, London: A secret government facility beneath Whitehall.

• Corsham, Wiltshire: A network of Cold War-era bunkers, including Spring Quarry and Monkton Farleigh Mine, used for military operations and storage.

• RAF Rudloe Manor, Corsham: Linked to MOD’s underground operations.

• Stockwell Deep-Level Shelter, London: WWII public shelter.

4. Preservation and Accessibility:

• Some sites are open to the public as museums, like the Hack Green Nuclear Bunker in Cheshire.

• Others remain classified or have been abandoned and are only accessible through urban exploration.

5. Recent Developments:

• Increasing interest in bunker construction due to modern security concerns, with private companies offering NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) protection shelters.

These sites highlight the UK’s preparation for past conflicts and ongoing interest in disaster preparedness. Many locations, like Corsham’s underground network, remain partially active or restricted, showcasing their strategic importance.

Attached is a news article regarding the nuclear bunkers in the uk

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgly74dkjjo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley