222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Saturday, 26 October 2024

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The Most Powerful Organizations in the World: Real Power Structures and the Enigmatic Illuminati

Introduction

Powerful organizations wield immense influence, shaping global politics, economies, and culture. While some organizations operate transparently, others are shrouded in mystery and conspiracy. Among these, the Illuminati remains one of the most compelling and enigmatic.

Global Power Structures: Real-World Influencers

1. The United Nations (UN)

• Role: Created to foster international cooperation, peace, and security.

• Influence: Directs humanitarian aid, enforces sanctions, and shapes global policy on climate, health, and human rights.

• Criticism: Often criticized for inefficiency and power imbalances, particularly due to the veto power held by the five permanent members of the Security Council.

2. The World Economic Forum (WEF)

• Role: Brings together global leaders, business moguls, and policymakers to address economic challenges.

• Influence: Known for initiatives like the “Great Reset” and the 4th Industrial Revolution, shaping discourse on technological advancement, environmental concerns, and economic restructuring.

• Public Perception: Some view the WEF as a forum for elite decision-making that lacks transparency.

3. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank

• Role: Provide financial support and policy advice to developing countries.

• Influence: Shape economic policies worldwide through their lending requirements, often affecting political landscapes in debtor countries.

• Controversies: Criticized for austerity measures that sometimes prioritize debt repayment over social needs.

4. The Big Tech Giants (FAANG)

• Role: Companies like Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google have revolutionized technology and the flow of information.

• Influence: Hold enormous influence over media, commerce, personal data, and even social interactions.

• Concerns: Many argue they hold too much power in shaping public opinion and collecting user data, sometimes with limited accountability.

The Illuminati: Fact, Fiction, or Somewhere In-Between?

The term “Illuminati” originated with the Bavarian Illuminati, an 18th-century secret society founded in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt. The organization aimed to promote enlightenment principles and secularism, countering what they saw as the influence of monarchy and church authority. However, it was disbanded by 1785 due to government opposition.

Since then, the idea of the Illuminati has evolved into a symbol for an elite ruling class purported to control world affairs behind the scenes.

The Illuminati Conspiracy Theory

Many believe that the Illuminati continues to exist as a shadowy network that controls world events. Its supposed members are said to be powerful leaders, celebrities, and business magnates who pull strings behind closed doors. Rumored to manipulate everything from political events to the media, the Illuminati is seen as the puppet master of the modern world.

• Symbols and Culture: Symbols like the “all-seeing eye” and pyramids are often associated with the Illuminati in popular culture, despite lacking historical ties to the original organization.

• Celebrity Links: Many conspiracy theories claim celebrities are part of the Illuminati, citing symbolism in music videos, fashion, and public appearances. These theories are widespread on social media, where pop culture and conspiracy theories collide.

• Critics: Skeptics argue that the Illuminati is a fictional construct, amplified by imagination, fear, and the internet. They see it as an amalgamation of rumors without evidence.

Power and Myth: Why the Illuminati Persists in Popular Consciousness

The Illuminati’s legend endures partly because it provides a narrative for understanding real, opaque global power dynamics. As influential organizations, corporations, and governments grow in scope and power, the concept of a hidden elite resonates with people seeking explanations for global inequalities and injustices.

1. Fear of Power Concentration: The notion of a hidden hand resonates in a world where wealth and power are concentrated in the hands of a few, feeding suspicions about unseen manipulation.

2. Mystery and Human Nature: Secret societies like the Illuminati tap into a natural curiosity about the unknown, making them ripe for speculation.

3. Modern Media Influence: Social media amplifies Illuminati theories, often blending satire, pop culture references, and real-world issues, creating a mix of irony and genuine belief.

Conclusion

While real-world organizations hold enormous influence over global affairs, the Illuminati remains a captivating symbol of hidden power. Whether fact or fiction, the myth of the Illuminati reveals society’s underlying concerns about transparency, inequality, and the unseen forces that shape our world. In a time when actual organizations operate with often opaque motives, the legend of the Illuminati serves as both cautionary tale and fascinating cultural phenomenon.

This piece combines factual exploration with a balanced view on conspiracy, appealing to readers interested in both actual power dynamics and the mythos surrounding secret societies.

Attached is a news article regarding the most powerful organisation in the world

https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20160330-the-worlds-most-powerful-corporation

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The UK Deports 44 Nigerians and Ghanaians in Controversial Return Operation

In a recent and controversial move, the United Kingdom has deported 44 individuals back to Nigeria and Ghana, sparking significant debate and raising questions about immigration policies and human rights. The deportees, who were removed from the UK on a chartered flight, included people with various immigration statuses, some of whom had lived in the country for years. This development has received attention from activists, organizations, and government officials in both the UK and the receiving countries.

Details of the Deportation

According to reports, the deportation was carried out on a charter flight, which took off in the early hours from a London airport and arrived in Lagos, Nigeria, before continuing to Accra, Ghana. Some deportees were individuals with expired visas, while others had entered the UK unlawfully or had failed asylum claims. The UK government claims the action is part of ongoing efforts to enforce immigration laws and ensure that individuals without the right to remain in the country are returned.

However, human rights organizations and activists have raised concerns about the impact of such deportations, especially when individuals are returned to countries where they may face hardship or lack sufficient support networks. There is also significant criticism surrounding the lack of transparency and what some claim is an aggressive approach to immigration enforcement.

The Reactions and Protests

Human rights groups and community organizations in the UK have condemned the deportation as unjust, arguing that the individuals returned may face challenges adapting back into society and may lack essential support systems in their home countries. Protesters gathered outside the UK Home Office to denounce the government’s actions and highlight the potential harm to those deported.

Critics argue that the deportations are inhumane, especially in cases where individuals have lived in the UK for extended periods, raised families, and established communities. Furthermore, some of the deportees reportedly left behind children, spouses, and other family members. The implications for these families are profound, with many left uncertain about their futures and the future of their loved ones.

In response, a UK government spokesperson defended the deportation policy, stating, “The UK has a robust immigration system in place. We work to ensure that those who do not have the legal right to stay are returned in a fair and transparent manner.” They emphasized that these deportations are necessary to maintain an orderly immigration system and to honor the country’s commitment to uphold its borders.

Impact on Deportees and Families

For the deportees, returning to Nigeria and Ghana may come with substantial challenges. Many have spent years building lives in the UK, and reintegrating into societies they may have left long ago poses unique hardships. For some, the return means restarting their lives from scratch in environments where economic opportunities may be limited.

One Nigerian deportee, who preferred to remain anonymous, described the experience as traumatic. “I have lived in the UK for over a decade,” he shared. “I have children who were born there and know no other home. Being sent back without warning is heartbreaking.”

Family members left in the UK are also struggling to cope. Organizations supporting migrants have criticized the emotional toll these deportations have on families, particularly on children who may now face separation from one or both parents.

The Broader Context: UK’s Immigration Policies

This deportation highlights the UK’s increasingly strict immigration policies under the current administration. The Home Office has reiterated its commitment to enforcing a “firm but fair” immigration policy, yet many argue that the system disproportionately targets certain groups, leading to perceptions of discrimination and bias. The deportation also sheds light on the often-opaque process surrounding deportations, which many feel does not allow adequate time or support for deportees to challenge removal orders.

Furthermore, this event raises questions about the UK’s relationships with African nations. Nigeria and Ghana have been key partners for the UK, and deportations can complicate diplomatic relations. Both countries are grappling with issues related to brain drain and the emigration of skilled workers, and receiving deportees may exacerbate challenges related to employment and social integration.

A Call for Policy Change

Advocates for immigration reform in the UK are using this incident to call for a reevaluation of deportation policies. They urge the government to adopt a more compassionate approach, taking into account the human impact of such actions, particularly in cases involving families and individuals with deep roots in British society. Campaigners argue for policies that prioritize the welfare and rights of individuals, especially those who have lived in the UK for significant periods.

The deportation of these 44 Nigerians and Ghanaians serves as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding immigration and the human stories behind policy decisions. As debates continue, activists and affected families hope that future policies will better reflect the nuances of immigration, balancing enforcement with compassion.

Attached is a article regarding the immigration policy process

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c302m85qe1vt

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Foods to Avoid Around the World: A Global Guide to Cuisine Caution

Exploring foods from different cultures is a huge part of the travel experience. But while it’s fun to embrace local delicacies, certain foods can be a little too adventurous—or even dangerous. Here’s a guide to some foods that travelers might want to think twice about before tasting.

1. Fugu (Japan)

• What it is: Fugu, or pufferfish, is a Japanese delicacy that’s highly dangerous if prepared incorrectly.

• Why to avoid it: The fish contains tetrodotoxin, a poison that can paralyze and kill. Only licensed chefs with years of training are allowed to prepare it, but accidents can happen.

• Alternatives: If you’re curious about Japanese seafood, sushi or sashimi made with safer fish is a great option.

2. Casu Marzu (Italy)

• What it is: Casu Marzu is a Sardinian cheese containing live insect larvae.

• Why to avoid it: The cheese is technically illegal in the EU due to health risks. It’s fermented with maggots, which some people say can survive digestion if consumed alive, posing a health risk.

• Alternatives: Stick to other Italian cheeses like Pecorino or Parmesan, which offer a similar flavor profile without the extra protein.

3. Hakarl (Iceland)

• What it is: This traditional Icelandic dish is made from fermented shark.

• Why to avoid it: The shark meat contains toxins that make it unsafe to eat fresh, so it’s buried for fermentation and then hung to dry for months. The taste is overwhelmingly fishy and has a strong ammonia smell.

• Alternatives: Try Icelandic smoked salmon or trout for a less challenging taste of the sea.

4. Blood Clams (China)

• What it is: Blood clams are a type of shellfish known for their dark, blood-red color.

• Why to avoid it: They can carry diseases like hepatitis and typhoid. In some regions, their harvesting is banned due to health concerns.

• Alternatives: Safer options like regular clams or mussels provide similar flavors without the risks.

5. Monkey Brains (Various Countries)

• What it is: Consumed in some cultures as a delicacy, monkey brains are typically served raw.

• Why to avoid it: This dish is dangerous not only due to disease risk but also for ethical and environmental reasons. It can lead to transmission of zoonotic diseases, which can be deadly to humans.

• Alternatives: Explore other protein sources in these areas, like regional vegetables or poultry dishes.

6. San-nakji (South Korea)

• What it is: A popular dish in South Korea, san-nakji is octopus served so fresh it’s still moving.

• Why to avoid it: The tentacles can retain suction power even when cut, posing a choking hazard. Inexperienced eaters should proceed with caution.

• Alternatives: Grilled or cooked octopus, which is common in Korean cuisine, offers a safer way to enjoy this delicacy.

7. Ackee (Jamaica)

• What it is: Ackee is a fruit beloved in Jamaican cuisine, typically cooked and paired with salted fish.

• Why to avoid it: Ackee can be toxic if it’s not ripened and prepared properly. The unripe fruit contains hypoglycin, a compound that can lead to “Jamaican vomiting sickness.”

• Alternatives: Only consume ackee from reputable sources, or stick to other Caribbean fruits like mango or papaya.

8. Bullfrog (Namibia)

• What it is: The Namibian bullfrog is eaten in various African countries, especially Namibia, where it’s a seasonal treat.

• Why to avoid it: The frog contains toxins that can cause kidney failure if not prepared correctly. Eating it during the wrong season can increase the risk.

• Alternatives: Sample other popular local dishes like biltong (cured meat) or fish from nearby rivers.

9. Sannakji (South Korea)

• What it is: Served raw and often still wriggling, sannakji is octopus eaten in Korea with soy and sesame.

• Why to avoid it: A swallowing hazard, the tentacles’ suction can attach to throats, causing choking.

• Alternatives: Try seafood dishes cooked or grilled, which are safe and equally flavorful.

Final Thoughts

From fermented shark in Iceland to the venomous fugu of Japan, adventurous eaters have plenty of options—but some dishes come with risks. By sticking to local favorites without the hazards, you can taste the world without worrying about your safety.

Attached is a news article regarding the food not to eat around the world

https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/20/to-eat-or-not-to-eat-10-of-the-worlds-most-controversial-foods

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Tommy Robinson, also known by his birth name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was recently charged under the Terrorism Act after a confrontation with law enforcement at Folkestone’s Eurotunnel terminal.

The charge falls under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which enables authorities to stop, search, and detain individuals at borders without suspicion of a specific offense.

This statute also mandates that individuals provide information such as PIN codes for electronic devices, as authorities may view such data as relevant to counter-terrorism operations. Robinson’s refusal to share his phone’s PIN code led to this charge.

The incident occurred as Robinson was detained upon his return to the UK, with law enforcement reportedly interested in accessing his mobile device.

The mobile PIN request is a standard protocol under Schedule 7, which is designed to prevent potential terror-related activities. Robinson’s case echoes a 2020 incident involving Paul Golding, leader of the far-right group Britain First, who similarly faced legal repercussions for refusing to unlock his phone when stopped at an airport under the same provision.

This charge is separate from another ongoing legal matter involving Robinson. He was recently remanded into custody on allegations of contempt of court.

This contempt charge relates to claims that Robinson violated a High Court injunction by repeating defamatory statements about Jamal Hijazi, a Syrian refugee who had previously sued him successfully.

Robinson is alleged to have aired a film titled Silenced at a protest in Trafalgar Square in July, which purportedly included defamatory content regarding Hijazi. This alleged breach of the court order has led to Robinson facing a two-day hearing set for October 28 at Woolwich Crown Court.

Following Robinson’s arrest, both supporters and detractors have mobilized, with planned demonstrations in London. Supporters of Robinson, under the banner “Unite the Kingdom,” are set to march from Victoria Station to Whitehall, while counter-protesters organized by Stand Up to Racism are expected to rally nearby.

Given Robinson’s polarizing figure, police are prepared for potential clashes and have implemented strategic measures to keep opposing groups separated to prevent violent confrontations.

Attached is a news article regarding Tommy Robinson being charged under the terrorism act

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tommy-robinson-march-live-protests-london-far-right-met-police-b2636026.html

Article written and configured Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Romania: A Land of Warmth and Hospitality

Romania, a hidden gem nestled in Eastern Europe, is renowned for its scenic landscapes, rich history, and, perhaps above all, the friendliness and warmth of its people.

Visitors to Romania often leave with cherished memories of not only the sights but also the hospitality that makes this country unique.

Romanians are known for welcoming guests with open arms, treating strangers like family, and showing a deep-rooted kindness that makes anyone feel at home.

The Tradition of Hospitality

Romanian culture places a high value on hospitality, a custom that dates back centuries.

The idea of “omul sfânt” or “holy man” reflects the belief that every guest should be treated with respect and care, no matter their background.

This concept of generosity is deeply embedded in Romanian values, where guests are often welcomed with food, drink, and a genuine interest in their well-being.

In rural areas, this hospitality is even more pronounced. It’s not uncommon for Romanians to invite travelers into their homes, offering a warm meal and sharing stories. For many, this hospitality is second nature—a way of life rather than a special effort. In larger cities like Bucharest or Cluj-Napoca, the same spirit lives on. Here, locals are always eager to help, whether it’s with directions, travel tips, or simply sharing the best spots to experience authentic Romanian culture.

A Meal to Remember

Food is a centerpiece of Romanian hospitality. Guests are often greeted with traditional dishes, which can include “sarmale” (cabbage rolls stuffed with meat and rice), “mici” (grilled sausages), and “mămăligă” (a cornmeal dish often served with cheese and sour cream). Romanians take pride in their cuisine and love to share it with newcomers. Meals are often served with homemade “țuică” (a traditional plum brandy), as a way to celebrate friendship.

The generosity extends to the way Romanians treat visitors at the table. Meals are an occasion to share stories, laugh, and build connections.

This warm welcome is a hallmark of Romanian hospitality, and it leaves a lasting impression on guests who find themselves not just eating, but also feeling like they’re part of the family.

The Spirit of Friendship

Romanians are not only friendly but also curious about other cultures. They enjoy exchanging stories and learning about the lives of their visitors, creating a two-way connection that enriches both sides.

This openness fosters genuine friendships, and many travelers find that the friends they make in Romania remain in their lives long after they’ve returned home.

Whether you’re in the bustling streets of Bucharest or the quiet countryside of Maramureș, you’ll likely encounter someone eager to share a bit of Romania with you. From a spontaneous conversation at a coffee shop to an invite to a local event, Romanians embody a friendliness that makes everyone feel at ease.

A Lasting Impact

Romania’s people are one of its greatest treasures. Their openness, kindness, and willingness to share their culture leave a profound impact on all who visit.

Travelers often speak about the bonds they form, the meals shared, and the warm welcomes received. It’s no wonder that Romania is a place where strangers become friends, and friends become family.

So, if you’re considering a visit to Romania, prepare for an experience that goes beyond the scenic landscapes and historic sites.

Be ready to feel the warmth of its people, share in the spirit of friendship, and immerse yourself in a culture where hospitality is a way of life. Romania is a land of beauty, not only in its mountains and architecture but also in the kindness of its people, who make every guest feel like they belong.

Article regarding the hospitality in Romania

https://www.thediplomat.ro/2024/03/19/colliers-very-good-year-in-2023-for-romanian-tourism/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

The claim that African nations are selling human meat is an unfounded and widely debunked myth with no credible basis.

Such rumors are often sensationalized to spread fear, incite hatred, or reinforce negative stereotypes about African countries.

This misinformation typically circulates on social media, where it gains traction due to its shocking nature, even though it lacks any legitimate evidence.

Such claims can have damaging consequences. They perpetuate harmful stereotypes, stigmatize African communities, and misinform global audiences.

False narratives about “human meat markets” have repeatedly been debunked by independent fact-checkers and reputable organizations.

Many African nations are diverse societies with rich cultural traditions and robust food security policies, and any legitimate issues they may face are best understood within their actual contexts.

It’s crucial to fact-check before accepting or spreading information, particularly when it could negatively impact communities.

Reliable sources and thorough research help build an accurate understanding of different cultures and communities, promoting global unity rather than fear.

The question we ask, why are human bones being used to enhance drugs in an African nation called Sierra Leone, what impact can this have on the psychological impact through other cultures” that concern the nation of a origin that is troubled by so much corruption.

Attached is a news article regarding the human bone that make drugs in Sierra Leone

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-68742694.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, Sponsored by smileband,

Incest Between Mother and Son: Legal Implications, Criminality, and Jail Terms

Incest is considered one of the most stigmatized and strictly prohibited forms of criminal activity globally. It refers to sexual relations between family members who are closely related by blood, and in many jurisdictions, it includes any sexual relations between a mother and son. The illegality of such acts reflects deep societal taboos as well as concerns for the potential negative psychological and biological impacts of such relationships.

Defining Incest in Legal Terms

The exact legal definition of incest can vary significantly by country and jurisdiction. However, in most countries, incest is defined as any form of sexual activity or relationship between family members who are closely related by blood, usually including parents and children, siblings, and often uncles/aunts and nieces/nephews.

In many jurisdictions, incest is treated as a strict liability offense, meaning that intent or consent are often irrelevant in determining guilt. Even if both parties are willing, the legal system often regards any form of incestuous relationship as illegal and punishable. This includes situations involving both minors and adults.

Legal Consequences and Criminal Penalties

The legal penalties for incest also vary widely depending on the country and the exact circumstances. In the United Kingdom, for example, incest between a mother and son is classified as a serious sexual offense. Both parties involved, if consenting adults, may be subject to criminal charges. The law assumes that family relationships inherently imply power imbalances that could lead to coercion or exploitation, which is one reason incest is criminalized.

UK Sentencing Guidelines: In the UK, incest is considered a form of sexual abuse, and the penalties for this crime are severe. The Sentencing Council for England and Wales issues guidelines based on factors such as the ages of the involved parties, prior criminal history, and evidence of coercion or manipulation. A typical jail term for incestuous acts between a mother and son can range from 2 to 10 years, depending on the severity of the offense. In cases where coercion, manipulation, or abuse of a vulnerable person is proven, sentences can reach or even exceed this upper limit.

In cases where the relationship is non-consensual or involves minors, the penalties are even more stringent. Sexual offenses against minors carry mandatory prison sentences, which can range up to life imprisonment depending on the specifics of the case. Even consensual relationships between family members, if they involve individuals under the age of 18, result in significant legal repercussions.

Penalties in the United States: In the United States, incest laws are governed by individual states, leading to variability in sentencing. Some states consider incest a third-degree felony, carrying sentences of up to 5 years, while others may impose sentences of up to 20 years for similar offenses. States such as Texas and Florida have some of the harshest penalties, often involving mandatory prison sentences and lifetime sex offender registration.

Factors Affecting Sentencing

Several factors influence the length and severity of sentencing in incest cases:

• Age of the Parties: If a minor is involved, the penalties are typically much harsher, with mandatory minimum sentences that are often significantly longer.

• Consent: Consent is often not a defense for incest, even if both parties are legally adults, due to concerns about coercion, manipulation, and the societal implications of incestuous relationships.

• History of Abuse: If there is evidence of coercion, abuse, or exploitation, sentences can be extended, reflecting the perceived level of harm inflicted on the victim.

• Repeated Offenses: Incest as a repeated offense can carry harsher sentences, as repeat offenders may be viewed as a higher risk to society.

Rationale Behind Incest Laws

The prohibition of incest is rooted in historical, psychological, and biological concerns. One primary reason for incest laws is the prevention of sexual abuse within families, where power imbalances can be significant. Additionally, incestuous relationships carry an increased risk of genetic disorders in offspring due to limited gene diversity. Lastly, incest is seen as a violation of social and moral standards that underpin family structures and relationships.

Psychological and Societal Implications

While legal systems in most countries take a strict approach to incest, the psychological consequences for individuals involved in these cases are often severe. Family members who engage in incestuous relationships can face social ostracism, emotional trauma, and significant long-term psychological challenges. The criminalization of incest serves not only as a deterrent but also as a way to protect individuals from potentially damaging relationships within the family structure.

Conclusion

The criminal offense of incest, including between a mother and son, is treated with gravity in the legal systems of most countries. Jail terms can vary widely depending on the circumstances but often involve substantial prison sentences, fines, and mandatory sex offender registration. By enforcing strict legal penalties, societies seek to prevent abuse, protect family integrity, and uphold cultural and moral standards.

Attached is a article regarding incest between a mother and son criminal offence

https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/mother-son-incest-rise-report-sex-abuse-agencies/story?id=9209454

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley