There are Some of the country's biggest charities have been branded an 'utter disgrace' after a new report claimed one in five spend less than half of their income on good causes.

The report, alleges that 1,020 voluntary organisations - with a combined annual income of £6billion - spend half or less of their cash on good work, including the British Heart Foundation and Age UK.

Nearly 300 spend just 10 per cent - and The Lloyd's Register Foundation uses only one per cent of the money, according to the explosive document.

Many charities disputed the figures in the report released today by the True and Fair Foundation - deeming them 'totally misleading. But Gina Miller, founder of the True and Fair Foundation said in a statement, 'It is an utter disgrace that so much of the money people generously give is going to feed large charity machines, which are often characterised by obscene overheads and salaries, aggressive fundraising, and bloated marketing and publicity departments; resulting in questionable levels of charitable spending. The report claims that Cancer Research UK and The Guide Dogs For The Blind Association - two of the UK's biggest charities - spend 64 per cent of their respective incomes on charitable activities.

Meanwhile, Marie Carie was found to give just one per cent more of its donations - at 65 per cent.

Below the 50 per cent mark, the British Heart Foundation was said to spend an average of just 46 per cent of its cash on good work - while Age UK apparently gives a slightly higher 48 per cent. 

Sir Stephen Bubb, Chief Executive of ACEVO, said: 'It is bizarre that people who worked in the sophisticated world of finance have overlooked the lesson of the Kids Company collapse. 

'Namely, that to spend every penny on the frontline and neglect other essential spending leads inevitably to the collapse of the frontline with tragic consequences. 

'Kids Company taught us that it is vital that charities invest money in resilience, professionalism and for the long term.

'This flawed and simplistic analysis arbitrarily defines ‘charitable activity’ to exclude campaigning and other fund raising activity. 

'Yet these are the lifeblood of the great British charitable tradition. We work to alleviate the symptoms of disease and poverty and to tackle the causes of such. Donors give money for both.'

The Charity Commission agreed that the analysis was 'flawed'. 

It added that the report had not 'considered basic information in the charities’ accounts'.

In a blog, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations referred to the report as 'neither true nor fair', explaining how charities add public donations to their trading to boost the amount of money they have to spend on good causes. It described the study as 'misleading in its analysis'.

The True and Fair Foundation concludes its 'A Hornets' Nest' report by declaring that trust in the charity sector 'is being eroded as light is shone on negative practices', and that charities have to ' evolve and be transparent so donors can be confident that they have a right to be supported. 

A British hacker is set to appear in a Las Vegas court today accused of creating malicious software used to raid bank accounts - but family, friends and supporters claim it is a set up.

Marcus Hutchins, 23, was arrested by the FBI in a first class airport lounge and now faces a maximum of 40 years in jail if convicted.

He is the hero who saved the NHS after finding the 'kill switch' that paralysed the WannaCry 'ransomware' that hit more than 300,000 computers in 150 countries in May.

Hutchins is now charged with six counts of making a 'Trojan' program that captures computer users' passwords and personal information and was sold online for £1,500 - but many believe federal officers have the wrong man.

His mother Janet Hutchins said it was 'hugely unlikely' that her son was involved because he has spent 'enormous amounts of time' combating such attacks. 

Jake Williams, a respected US cybersecurity researcher, said they have worked on various projects, including training material, and the Briton always refused payment.

He said: 'He's a stand-up guy. I can't reconcile the charges with what I know about him. I don't doubt that some of his code found it's way into malware. He might have even helped criminals posing as researchers'.

Friend Andrew Mabbitt, a British digital security specialist who had been staying in a £5million rented Las Vegas mansion with Hutchins, said: 'I refuse to believe the charges. He spent his career stopping malware, not writing it'.  Marcus Hutchins now faces months battling the American courts and could be jailed for 40 years if found guilty of taking part in a hacking conspiracy to steal bank details.

The Devon-born computer expert, who lives with his mum and dad, was held as he tried to leave the US on a first class Virgin Atlantic flight two days ago. 

Federal agents took him into custody and he appeared in the Las Vegas court on Thursday but the hearing was adjourned to be continued today.

An indictment was issued by a grand jury impanelled by the US Attorney in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gregory Haanstad. 

The federal prosecutor in Nevada is likely to ask federal judge Nancy Koppe to have Hutchins extradited to Milwaukee to be arraigned. 

He faces six hacking charges that each carry a six-and-a-half-year prison sentence meaning he could face decades in a US jail if convicted. 

Mr Hutchins is likely to have to pay a huge bail to be released and will not be able to leave America.

His friends and supporters say that he has been set up. 

They have found tweets where he asks for samples of the malware he is accused of creating.

Some have said that the way he killed off the WannaCry 'ransomware' that swept across the globe embarrassed America's own security services.

NSA security researchers initially developed the tool to hack into the computers of suspected terrorists and spies,  but it was taken on by criminals who then used it to take over computers and extort cash from victims if they wanted control back. 

A South Australian doctor has performed a historic operation on a Cambodian man who's entire mouth had been closed over with a huge growth emanating from his lip.

Eng Kheng, a resident in a remote village in the country's Kampong Cham province, has been living with the condition for 30 years and had never received dental treatment.

Dr Andrew Cheng, an Adelaide-based doctor, heard about Mr Kheng's incredible case through a charity he works with in Cambodia, and wanted to help.

'I've never see anything like this before. I don't think anyone around the world has seen anything that big,' Dr Cheng told Daily Mail Australia. Mr Kheng was originally being looked at by doctors for cataracts, before shocked doctors noticed the growth in his mouth.

They alerted Dr Cheng, who flew with his mentor to Mr Kheng's village after being sent medical information from Cambodian clinicians. 'The local doctors and surgeons organised CT scans to make sure it wasn't a malignancy. We managed to utilise all the CT scans in the photos to plan the surgery in Australia.'

The size of the growth from his gums was the result of a rare condition called Gingival Hyperplasia. There is a one in 750,000 chance of being diagnosed with the condition according to Dr Cheng. 

Mr Kheng was forced to adapt his eating and swallowing, only being able to consume certain foods.

'He usually only had fluids, cooked rice, noodles and soup. And lemonade, he loves lemonade,' Dr Cheng told Daily Mail Australia.

'He was able to swallow but the way he swallowed was different to you or I. He kinks his neck back and swallows, a bit like a bird.'

His airwaves have experienced a degree of narrowing but fortunately Mr Kheng never had any issues breathing, despite dealing with the condition for 30 years.

A former young star of EastEnders who went on to become a youth worker faces jail for child sex abuse.

Joseph Shade played Peter Beale, the son of long-running character Ian Beale, in the BBC soap from 1998 to 2004 before working at a project for 'vulnerable' young people in Norfolk.

He had denied claims he abused his position of trust to incite teenage girls to engage in sexual activity.

But on what should have been the third day of his trial today, he dramatically changed his plea and admitted six offences.

A judge told him he could be jailed when he returns to court for sentencing.

Shade, 24, admitted five counts of causing or inciting a child under 18 to engage in sexual activity while in a position of trust.

He also pleaded guilty to one count of sexual activity with a child by a person in a position of trust.

Prosecutor Chris Paxton told Norwich Crown Court that Shade was a youth worker at a project in Norfolk when he sent sexual text messages to girls and touched one on the bottom. The offences were against three girls aged between 14 and 17, and happened between 2012 and 2015.

'He himself attended that youth project as a young person and got help from them,' said Mr Paxton. 

'As he reached the age of 18 he became formally employed as a youth worker and in this capacity as a youth worker he then engaged with many young people who came from similar backgrounds and vulnerabilities as he had. The prosecutor added: 'During the course of his employment he accepts by his pleas that his relationships became too close to a number of attendees and he would engage with them by texting them messages asking them to have sex or to send sexual pictures of breasts and the like.

'On one occasion and only one occasion he touched one of them.'

Mr Paxton said Shade had no previous convictions and was 'tearful and expressed a degree of remorse' when he was interviewed by police.

Shade, of Sheringham, Norfolk, appeared unshaven in a blue shirt, dark blue tie and suit trousers and spoke only to enter his pleas.

The trial had been due to start on Monday and Shade denied 11 sexual offences against four girls, but on the fourth day of trial he admitted six sexual offences against three girls and the prosecution ordered that the remaining five counts lie on file.

Mr Paxton said: 'The Crown accepts those guilty pleas to deal in a satisfactory way with the entirety of the indictment, therefore we would not need to engage the services of the jury in relation to the other counts. 

A model who tried to steal £1,000 worth of designer goods from Harrods was let off with a conditional discharge after a magistrate said she was a woman of ‘considerable talents’.

Natalia Sikorska, 28, attempted to make off with a Markus Lupfer jacket, a pair of Claudie Pierlot shoes, a Pinko handbag and the silver knife on 5 July.

But she was stopped before she left the Knightsbridge, London, store with the haul worth £959.59.

After she admitted theft Westminster Magistrate Grant McCrostie gave her a conditional discharge for 12 months and said: ‘You are a newcomer to this county, you are a student with a place at university.

‘You are obviously a woman of considerable talents, you are obviously intelligent.

‘Taking goods from any store, including Harrods is wrong.

‘Your future has been put at risk by these actions.

‘Because of the fact that you pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity and you do have a potentially bright future, we will deal with this more leniently than we should have. ‘It will be a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months.’

Mr McCrostie said if Sikorska stays out of trouble for that period she will not face any further punishment.

‘You have been given another opportunity do not abuse the opportunity we have given you, stay out of trouble,’ he said.

Sikorska replied: ‘Thank you so much.’

The Polish model and actress is currently studying business management and economics at the University of Westminster. She also works as a business development manager for drinks bottle manufacturers Aquatiser and an interpreter.

She previously studied psychology at the University of Warsaw and has worked as a sales associate with variety of luxurious brands such as Saint Laurent Paris, Globe Trotter and Hugo Boss.

Sikorska, of Chelsea, West London, was given a conditional discharge, ordered to pay £85 costs and a £20 victim surcharge. 

A surgeon jailed for 15 years after carrying out needless breast operations faces a bid to increase his sentence.

Ian Paterson, who left victims scarred and disfigured, was handed the prison term in May following a trial at Nottingham Crown Court.

But Court of Appeal judges are now being asked to rule on whether a term of 15 years for his crimes is 'unduly lenient' and should be increased.

The case has been referred to the court by Solicitor General Robert Buckland.

Lady Justice Hallett, Mrs Justice Carr and Mr Justice Goss will review the sentence at a hearing in London on Thursday.

Paterson, 59, from Altrincham, Greater Manchester, was convicted by a jury of offences of wounding with intent and unlawful wounding against ten patients.

Sentencing him to a total of 15 years, Mr Justice Jeremy Baker told Paterson: 'You deliberately played upon their worst fears, either by inventing or deliberately exaggerating the risk that they would develop cancer.'

The judge added that Paterson therefore gained his patients' trust and confidence to manipulate them into consenting to the surgical procedures he carried out. Victims told the court of how Paterson's crimes had left them in constant pain and struggling to trust medical professionals.

The judge said that because of his actions, most of his victims were suffering from 'prolonged psychological conditions' including post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression.

In 2012, more than 700 patients of Paterson, who also worked in the NHS, were recalled after concerns about unnecessary or incomplete operations.

Following his trial, Paterson was struck off from the medical profession. 

A tribunal ruled that his actions were 'serious' as well as 'intentionally harmful' over a period of 14 years.

His failure to acknowledge any of his faults showed a lack of insight that indicated he still posed a serious risk to patients, the medical practitioners tribunal also concluded. 

THE father of one who died after being arrested by a police officer in an East London shop did NOT swallow drugs before he was tackled by cops, the police watchdog said.                           he 20-year-old’s death sparked violent crashes the following week when protesters marched on Stoke Newington police station.

A Independent Police Complaints Commission spokesman said: “The IPCC’s investigation into the circumstances of Rashan Charles’ death following contact with police in Hackney on 22 July is ongoing and making good progress.

“Our independent investigation is thoroughly examining all aspects of police interaction with Rashan prior to his death and has already undertaken a large number of investigative actions.

“The IPCC has now received results of forensic analysis of an object that was removed from Rashan’s airway by paramedics.

“The object did not contain a controlled substance.                       

Rashan charles was chased by police into a shop in Dalston on July 22 but later collapsed and died in custody. PCC staff met with Rashan’s family this afternoon (Wednesday 2 August) and updated them with this information and on the investigation’s progress.

“A post mortem took place on Monday 24 July and the IPCC is awaiting the preliminary findings from the pathologist.”

Mr Charles’ death sparked riots on the streets of the area with furious protesters pelting cops with missiles and setting objects on fire.