222 News

Smileband supports 10 charitable organisations that support across the UK and the world, 222 News look in to researched information that is based around news and health related subjects, by entering your e mail and subscribing and verifying it in your e mail box, you are helping support 10 charities that we give money too. Also if a person’s information has been posted or shared and they don’t like it please contact us and we will have it removed, please follow our News.

Wednesday, 22 January 2025

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Raging LA Wildfires Force Thousands to Flee as Destruction Spans 23 Football Pitches

Los Angeles is facing one of its worst wildfire seasons in years, as relentless flames continue to force thousands of residents to abandon their homes. The fires, fueled by dry conditions and strong winds, have already destroyed an area equivalent to 23 football pitches, leaving a trail of devastation in their wake.

Communities Evacuated Amid Growing Danger

Firefighters are battling tirelessly to contain the inferno, which has swept through residential neighborhoods, destroying homes and reducing once-thriving communities to ash. Evacuation orders have been issued for several areas, with authorities warning residents to leave immediately or risk being trapped by rapidly advancing flames.

“We lost everything,” said one evacuee, whose home was engulfed within hours. “It’s devastating to see years of memories reduced to rubble.”

Unfavorable Weather Conditions Fuel the Flames

The wildfires are being driven by strong Santa Ana winds and critically low humidity levels, creating a perfect storm for rapid fire spread. These conditions, combined with the region’s ongoing drought, have turned the landscape into a tinderbox, ready to ignite at the slightest spark.

According to the Los Angeles Fire Department, over 1,200 firefighters have been deployed to combat the flames, with air support providing water drops to slow the fire’s advance. Despite these efforts, containment remains challenging due to shifting winds and steep terrain.

Impact on Infrastructure and Health

The fires have not only destroyed homes but also severely impacted local infrastructure. Roads are closed, power lines are down, and thousands of residents are without electricity. Thick smoke blankets the area, posing serious health risks to those with respiratory conditions.

Hospitals have reported an uptick in patients suffering from smoke inhalation, and authorities are urging residents to wear masks and stay indoors if possible. Air quality in Los Angeles and surrounding areas has plummeted to hazardous levels.

Climate Change Concerns Intensify

Experts are linking the intensity and frequency of California’s wildfires to climate change. Rising global temperatures, prolonged droughts, and increased vegetation drying are creating conditions ripe for such disasters.

“This is the new normal,” warned a climate scientist at UCLA. “Unless we address the root causes, these fires will continue to devastate communities year after year.”

Relief Efforts Underway

Emergency shelters have been set up to accommodate displaced families, and local charities are working to provide food, clothing, and other essentials. However, many evacuees worry about the long-term recovery process, especially those who have lost their homes and livelihoods.

As the fires rage on, the resilience of the affected communities is being tested. For now, the priority remains saving lives and containing the flames, but the road to recovery will undoubtedly be long and arduous.

A Call for Action

The ongoing devastation in Los Angeles serves as a grim reminder of the urgent need to address climate change and invest in wildfire prevention measures. For those on the front lines, the battle continues, with hopes pinned on favorable weather and the tireless efforts of emergency responders.

As the embers smolder, the question remains: how can California, and the world, adapt to a future where such disasters become increasingly common.

Attached is a news article regarding the wild fires in LA

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj029138n4zo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

UK Issues Stern Warning to Putin as Russian Spy Ship Returns to British Waters

The UK government has issued a firm warning to Russian President Vladimir Putin after a Russian spy ship was detected operating in British waters. This latest provocation has raised tensions between the two nations, prompting a swift response from military and political leaders in London.

Russian Spy Ship Raises Concerns

The vessel, believed to be the Yantar or a similar reconnaissance ship, was spotted off the UK’s coastline, sparking fears of surveillance or potential interference with undersea infrastructure, such as communication cables and energy pipelines. These ships are often equipped with advanced equipment designed for intelligence-gathering and underwater operations, including robotic submarines capable of tampering with critical installations.

In response, the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed it was closely monitoring the ship’s movements, with Royal Navy warships and patrol aircraft shadowing the vessel as it approached British waters. The MoD spokesperson stated, “The UK is fully prepared to safeguard its territorial waters and infrastructure from any hostile activity. Any attempt to compromise our security will be met with decisive action.”

A Pattern of Escalation

This is not the first time Russian naval activity has caused alarm in the UK. Over the past year, there have been several instances of Russian ships loitering near critical undersea infrastructure, raising concerns about potential sabotage. The recent incident comes amidst heightened geopolitical tensions over Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine and its broader attempts to challenge NATO’s influence.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly condemned the ship’s presence, calling it a “provocative and unacceptable intrusion.” He added, “The UK will not tolerate any threats to its sovereignty or its critical infrastructure. President Putin should be under no illusion—his actions only strengthen our resolve to defend our nation and our allies.”

Strengthening Defences

In response to the growing threat, the UK government has announced plans to enhance its maritime security. This includes increased patrols, additional investment in naval capabilities, and closer collaboration with NATO allies to ensure a coordinated response to any future incidents.

The UK is also urging international partners to remain vigilant, warning that Russian actions could extend beyond British waters. Defence analysts suggest that Moscow’s strategy may involve testing Western responses to gauge weaknesses in collective security arrangements.

A Message to Moscow

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak addressed the nation, emphasizing the UK’s commitment to protecting its interests. “This latest action is yet another example of Russia’s reckless disregard for international norms. We stand united with our allies in confronting these threats and will take all necessary measures to ensure our security.”

While tensions continue to simmer, the UK’s decisive response sends a clear message to Moscow: acts of provocation will not go unchecked. As the situation develops, Britain’s readiness to defend its waters and infrastructure will remain a critical focus in its efforts to counter Russian aggression.

Analysis:

The return of Russian spy ships to British waters underscores the fragile state of international relations and the enduring threats posed by unconventional warfare. As technological advancements make undersea infrastructure increasingly vulnerable, the UK’s vigilance will be key to maintaining national and regional security.

Attached is a news article regarding the uk warning Putin about Russian spy ship in British waters

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqjv7qgpw28o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

On January 21, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump issued a stern ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin, demanding an immediate end to the ongoing war in Ukraine. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned that failure to negotiate peace would result in severe economic repercussions for Russia, including the imposition of high taxes, tariffs, and sanctions on Russian exports to the United States and allied nations.

Trump emphasized his preference for a peaceful resolution, stating, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” He urged Putin to engage in negotiations to prevent further escalation and loss of life, highlighting the detrimental impact of the war on Russia’s economy, which is already grappling with high inflation rates and significant casualties.

In response, Russia’s UN Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy acknowledged the ultimatum but insisted that any agreement must address the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis. He emphasized the need for comprehensive discussions that consider Russia’s security concerns and geopolitical interests.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed openness to negotiations, including discussions about Ukraine’s potential NATO membership. However, this remains a contentious point, as Russia views Ukraine’s alignment with NATO as a direct threat to its national security.

This development marks a significant shift in President Trump’s approach to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. During his campaign, Trump asserted that he could end the war within 24 hours of taking office. Now, he is adopting a more assertive stance, leveraging economic measures to compel Russia to the negotiating table. This strategy reflects a recognition of the complexities involved in resolving the conflict and the necessity of a multifaceted approach.

As the situation unfolds, the international community is closely monitoring the interactions between the United States, Russia, and Ukraine. The prospect of new economic sanctions adds pressure on Russia to consider diplomatic solutions, while Ukraine’s leadership remains committed to defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The coming days are expected to be critical in determining whether a peaceful resolution can be achieved or if further escalations are imminent.

Key Points on Trump’s Ultimatum to Putin Regarding the Ukraine War:

1. Ultimatum Issued:

• U.S. President Donald Trump demanded that Russian President Vladimir Putin immediately end the war in Ukraine.

• Trump threatened severe economic measures, including sanctions, tariffs, and taxes on Russian exports.

2. Direct Warning:

• Trump stated, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” signaling a strong stance to push for peace.

3. Economic Pressure:

• The ultimatum emphasizes using economic tools to coerce Russia into negotiations, reflecting Trump’s strategy of leveraging financial consequences.

4. Russia’s Response:

• Russia’s UN Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy acknowledged the ultimatum but insisted that peace talks must address Russia’s security concerns and geopolitical interests.

5. Ukraine’s Position:

• Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed willingness to negotiate but reaffirmed Ukraine’s stance on NATO membership, which remains a contentious issue for Russia.

6. Trump’s Shift in Strategy:

• During his campaign, Trump claimed he could end the war within 24 hours. His current approach involves a more assertive and multi-faceted stance, recognizing the complexity of the conflict.

7. International Implications:

• The ultimatum puts additional pressure on Russia, as the international community closely watches the situation for signs of de-escalation or further escalation.

8. Impact on Global Relations:

• The U.S.’s assertive role under Trump’s leadership may shift the dynamics of the conflict, testing diplomatic and economic ties with allies and adversaries.

9. Key Focus Areas:

• Resolving Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty while addressing Russia’s longstanding opposition to NATO expansion near its borders.

This development sets the stage for high-stakes negotiations in the coming days, with significant global implications depending on how both Russia and Ukraine respond.

Conclusion:

President Donald Trump’s ultimatum to Vladimir Putin marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. By leveraging the threat of severe economic penalties, Trump is adopting a decisive and forceful strategy to compel Russia toward a peaceful resolution. While the ultimatum has added urgency to the situation, the path to peace remains fraught with challenges, including addressing Russia’s security concerns and Ukraine’s aspirations for NATO membership.

As global leaders weigh in, the success of Trump’s approach will depend on his ability to navigate the complex dynamics of diplomacy, economic pressure, and international alliances. The world now watches closely, hoping for a resolution that ends the suffering in Ukraine and restores stability to the region. Whether this ultimatum leads to meaningful negotiations or escalates tensions further remains to be seen.

Attached is a news article regarding trump threat to end the war

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjw4q7v7ez1o.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

In 2025, the UK’s Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is implementing significant changes to the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) system, aiming to enhance support for individuals with disabilities and long-term health conditions. These reforms are designed to ensure that benefits are effectively targeted and that the system remains sustainable for the future.

Key Changes to PIP in 2025:

1. Revised Payment Dates:

• Due to the New Year bank holiday, PIP payments scheduled for January 1, 2025, will be advanced to December 31, 2024. Regular payment schedules will resume from January 2, 2025.

2. Discontinuation of Motability Payments:

• Effective January 3, 2025, the £750 New Vehicle Payment under the Motability scheme will be discontinued. Similarly, the £100 New Product Payment for scooters and powered wheelchairs will end on this date. Claimants must complete their vehicle orders by January 3 to benefit from these payments.

3. Benefit Rate Increases:

• Starting April 2025, PIP payment rates will increase by 1.7% in line with inflation. The daily living component’s standard rate will rise from £72.65 to £73.90 per week, and the enhanced rate will increase from £108.55 to £110.40. The mobility component’s standard rate will go up from £28.70 to £29.20 weekly, with the enhanced rate rising from £75.75 to £77.05.

4. Comprehensive System Overhaul:

• The DWP has launched a consultation to reform the disability benefits system, moving away from a fixed cash benefit approach towards more tailored support. This initiative aims to ensure that benefits are directed to those most in need, reflecting the changing health landscape since PIP’s introduction in 2013.

5. Assessment Process Reforms:

• Proposals include removing the PIP assessment entirely for individuals with certain long-term health conditions or disabilities, including terminal illnesses. The goal is to reduce bureaucracy and expedite support for those most in need.

6. Study on PIP Usage:

• The DWP is conducting a study to understand how claimants utilize their PIP payments, with findings expected in the summer of 2025. This research aims to inform future policy decisions to better support individuals with disabilities.

These reforms reflect the government’s commitment to modernizing the welfare system, ensuring it is fair, compassionate, and responsive to the evolving needs of individuals with disabilities and long-term health conditions.

Attached is a News article regarding the DWP PIP benefit news in 2025

https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cost-of-living/dwp-benefit-changes-coming-april-30807296.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

As of January 2025, there is no official confirmation from Tesla or its CEO, Elon Musk, regarding the development or release of a smartphone, often referred to in rumors as the “Tesla Pi Phone.” Speculation about such a device has been circulating for several years, fueled by fan-generated concepts and unverified reports. However, credible sources indicate that these claims lack substantial evidence.

In September 2020, Elon Musk addressed these rumors directly, stating, “Smartwatches & phones are yesterday’s technology, Neuralinks are the future.” This suggests that Musk envisions brain-machine interface technologies, like those being developed by Neuralink, as the next evolution in personal tech, potentially superseding traditional smartphones.

Despite the absence of official information, various speculative features have been attributed to the hypothetical Tesla Pi Phone:

• Solar Charging: Leveraging Tesla’s expertise in solar energy, the phone could feature integrated solar panels for supplementary charging. However, the practicality of such a feature is debatable, considering the limited surface area of a smartphone and the variable exposure to sunlight.

• Starlink Connectivity: Integration with SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service has been suggested, potentially providing global internet coverage. While intriguing, implementing satellite connectivity in a smartphone presents significant technical challenges, including the need for a bulky antenna and substantial power consumption.

• Neuralink Compatibility: Some speculate that the phone could interface directly with Neuralink’s brain-machine technology, allowing users to control the device through thought. This concept remains highly speculative and is not supported by current technological capabilities.

• Integration with Tesla Vehicles: A more plausible feature is seamless integration with Tesla cars, enabling users to control vehicle settings and functions directly from the smartphone. This would align with Tesla’s ecosystem approach and enhance user convenience.

Regarding pricing and production plans, no official details have been released, as the existence of the Tesla Pi Phone itself remains unconfirmed. Speculative estimates suggest that, if such a device were to be developed with the advanced features mentioned, it could be positioned at the higher end of the market, potentially costing over $1,000.

In summary, while the idea of a Tesla-branded smartphone is captivating and aligns with the company’s innovative image, there is no concrete evidence to support its development as of now. The speculative features attributed to the Tesla Pi Phone remain within the realm of fan concepts and unverified reports. For the foreseeable future, Tesla appears to be concentrating on its core ventures, including electric vehicles, autonomous driving technology, and renewable energy solutions.

Key Points on Tesla Pi Phone Speculations:

1. No Official Confirmation: Tesla and Elon Musk have not announced or confirmed plans to develop a smartphone, despite ongoing rumors.

2. Musk’s Vision: Elon Musk has referred to smartphones as “yesterday’s technology,” suggesting that Neuralink’s brain-machine interface might be the future.

3. Speculated Features (Unverified):

• Solar Charging: Incorporating Tesla’s solar tech for supplementary charging.

• Starlink Connectivity: Potential integration with SpaceX’s Starlink for global internet coverage.

• Neuralink Compatibility: Hypothetical control through brain-machine interfaces.

• Tesla Vehicle Integration: Enhanced control of Tesla cars via the phone.

4. Production and Pricing:

• No production plans or pricing details have been confirmed.

• Speculated price could exceed $1,000, given the advanced features attributed to it.

5. Focus on Other Projects: Tesla remains focused on electric vehicles, autonomous tech, and renewable energy, making the development of a phone unlikely in the near future.

Attached is a news article regarding the Tesla Pi phones 2025

https://uk.motor1.com/news/745502/tesla-model-pi-smartphone/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Greggs Introduces Padlocks to Combat Rising Theft

Popular bakery chain Greggs has implemented an unusual security measure across some of its UK branches to tackle a growing issue of theft. Customers visiting certain stores may notice products such as drinks and snacks secured with padlocks – an unexpected move for a business synonymous with convenience and affordability.

This new initiative comes as Greggs faces increasing challenges with shoplifting, particularly with grab-and-go items like bottles of water and soft drinks, which are easy to pocket. By attaching padlocks to these items, the company hopes to deter opportunistic thieves while maintaining the integrity of its self-service model.

A spokesperson for Greggs commented on the matter: “The safety of our customers and staff is our priority. These measures are being trialed in areas where shoplifting has become particularly problematic. It’s a practical solution to an issue that’s impacting many retailers.”

The decision highlights a broader issue in the retail sector, where theft has surged in the wake of the cost-of-living crisis. Rising inflation and economic instability have led to higher shoplifting rates across the UK, affecting both small businesses and major chains.

Some customers, however, have expressed surprise at the move, with some questioning whether padlocks on products are practical or send the wrong message. “It’s a bit strange to see padlocks in a bakery – it’s not what you expect when you’re grabbing a sausage roll,” one customer in Manchester said.

Retail experts argue that this measure reflects the balancing act retailers must navigate: ensuring product availability while safeguarding stock from theft. “While it may seem extreme, it’s a visible deterrent and a reminder that shoplifting has real consequences for businesses,” said retail consultant Joanne Davies.

Greggs is not alone in exploring unconventional security strategies. Supermarkets like Tesco and Sainsbury’s have implemented locked cases for high-value items such as baby formula, razor blades, and alcohol. The trend reflects the mounting pressures on businesses to adapt to evolving challenges in the retail environment.

For now, Greggs’ use of padlocks remains a trial, with the company monitoring its effectiveness before deciding whether to expand the measure to more stores. Whether this approach will prove effective or become a symbol of challenging times for the retail sector remains to be seen.

Attached is a news article regarding Greggs using padlocks to stop thieves from stealing

https://metro.co.uk/2025/01/10/greggs-store-puts-massive-padlock-fridges-try-stop-thieves-london-22333179/amp/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Trump’s Withdrawal of Support for NATO: A Blow to Transatlantic Unity

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a cornerstone of transatlantic security since its founding in 1949, has faced various challenges over the decades, but none as significant as the period during Donald Trump’s presidency. Known for his “America First” rhetoric, Trump took unprecedented steps in criticizing and diminishing U.S. support for NATO, an alliance historically viewed as vital to Western stability.

Trump’s Criticism of NATO

From the outset of his presidency in 2016, Trump repeatedly expressed dissatisfaction with NATO, labeling it “obsolete” and accusing member states of failing to contribute their fair share to the alliance. His primary grievance centered on defense spending. NATO guidelines call for member nations to allocate at least 2% of their GDP toward defense budgets, but by 2017, only a handful of members met this benchmark. Trump viewed this shortfall as an exploitation of U.S. resources, claiming that American taxpayers were unfairly shouldering Europe’s defense burden.

Strains on Transatlantic Relations

Trump’s public threats to withdraw the United States from NATO caused significant alarm among allies. In 2018, during a contentious NATO summit in Brussels, Trump reportedly suggested that the U.S. could “go it alone” if European nations did not immediately increase their defense spending. His transactional approach to diplomacy, treating alliances as business deals, marked a stark departure from decades of bipartisan U.S. support for NATO.

This rhetoric strained relations with key allies, including Germany, France, and Canada. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a staunch defender of NATO, found herself at odds with Trump’s confrontational tone, particularly over Germany’s defense contributions. French President Emmanuel Macron, meanwhile, described NATO as experiencing “brain death,” partly due to the United States’ waning commitment under Trump’s leadership.

U.S. Financial Contributions

While Trump was correct that the U.S. contributed disproportionately to NATO compared to other members, the alliance’s design had always accounted for America’s superpower status. The U.S. covered roughly 70% of NATO’s total defense spending, but many argued that this investment was crucial not only for European security but also for maintaining U.S. influence globally.

Despite his criticism, the Trump administration did increase U.S. troop deployments to Poland and supported NATO’s initiatives to counter Russian aggression. However, his persistent threats to withdraw undermined the alliance’s credibility, leaving allies questioning America’s long-term commitment.

The Fallout of Trump’s Approach

Trump’s stance on NATO emboldened adversaries like Russia, which has long sought to weaken transatlantic unity. The uncertainty surrounding U.S. support raised fears in Eastern Europe, particularly among NATO members like the Baltic states, which depend heavily on the alliance’s deterrence capabilities against potential Russian aggression.

Moreover, Trump’s actions sparked debates within Europe about the need for greater strategic autonomy. Some European leaders began advocating for an independent European defense strategy, signaling a shift in security dynamics.

Legacy and Lessons Learned

Although Trump did not ultimately withdraw the U.S. from NATO, his presidency left lasting scars on the alliance. His approach highlighted existing tensions over burden-sharing and forced member states to confront uncomfortable questions about their reliance on American military power.

Since Trump’s departure from office, President Joe Biden has sought to restore confidence in NATO, reaffirming America’s commitment to collective defense. However, Trump’s tenure served as a wake-up call, illustrating how fragile alliances can become when one partner questions their value.

As NATO continues to adapt to modern threats, including cyber warfare and rising authoritarianism, the Trump era will be remembered as a pivotal moment that tested the alliance’s resilience and forced its members to reconsider their commitments to collective security.

Attached is a news article regarding trumps withdrawal from nato

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/02/12/politics/us-out-nato-second-trump-term-former-senior-adviser

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

A 12-year-old boy was tragically stabbed to death in Birmingham’s Hall Green area on Tuesday, January 21, 2025. The incident occurred near Scribers Lane around 3:00 PM GMT. Emergency services arrived promptly, and the boy was transported to the hospital, but he sadly succumbed to his injuries.

West Midlands Police have arrested a 14-year-old boy on suspicion of murder in connection with the incident. The suspect is also linked to an assault on an 80-year-old woman in the same vicinity days earlier. Chief Superintendent Richard North described the scene as “chaotic and traumatic,” noting the presence of numerous witnesses.

The victim was a student at Christ Church Secondary Academy. His family described him as “a kind, sweet child without an aggressive bone in his body.” The school community is receiving support during this difficult time.

This incident highlights the ongoing issue of knife crime in the West Midlands. Recent statistics indicate that the region has the highest rate of knife offences in England and Wales, with over 5,000 incidents reported in the past year. The government has announced plans to introduce stronger measures to tackle knife sales online in the upcoming Crime and Policing Bill.

West Midlands Police are appealing to the public for any information, including photos or videos, that could assist in their investigation. They have established a Major Incident Public Portal for evidence submission. Detective Inspector Joe Davenport emphasized the importance of community assistance in solving this case.

Here are the key points about the stabbing of a 12-year-old boy in Birmingham:

1. Incident Details:

• A 12-year-old boy was stabbed near Scribers Lane in Hall Green, Birmingham, on January 21, 2025, around 3:00 PM.

• Emergency services rushed him to the hospital, but he tragically succumbed to his injuries.

2. Arrest Made:

• A 14-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of murder.

• The suspect is also linked to a recent assault on an 80-year-old woman in the same area.

3. Victim and Community:

• The victim was a student at Christ Church Secondary Academy and described as a “kind, sweet child” by his family.

• The school and local community are in mourning, with support being provided to those affected.

4. Knife Crime Context:

• The West Midlands has the highest knife crime rate in England and Wales, with over 5,000 incidents in the past year.

• The government is working on new measures, including tightening online knife sales, to address the crisis.

5. Police Appeal:

• West Midlands Police are seeking public assistance with evidence, including photos or videos, to aid their investigation.

• A Major Incident Public Portal has been set up for submissions.

6. Broader Impact:

• The case has reignited discussions about youth violence and the urgent need for community and governmental action to tackle knife crime.

Attached is a news article regarding a stabbing of a 12 year old boy in Birmingham

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg8q80npwxo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 Mews viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have publicly criticized Meta’s recent decision to discontinue its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, expressing concerns that this move will facilitate the spread of misinformation and hate speech.

In a statement released through their Archewell Foundation, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex argued that Meta’s policy change undermines free speech by allowing more abuse and normalizing hate speech, which serves to silence expression rather than foster it.

They emphasized that this decision prioritizes profit over public safety and contradicts Meta’s stated mission to “build human connection.”

The couple also expressed alarm over Meta’s plans to scale back commitments to diversity and equity, stating that such actions undermine protections for marginalized communities.

They urged Meta to reconsider and reinstate policies that protect all users, highlighting the company’s responsibility to ensure that its platforms do not contribute to a global mental health crisis.

This criticism follows Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that the company will replace its fact-checking program with a “Community Notes” system, similar to the approach used by Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).

This new model shifts the responsibility for identifying misinformation to users, allowing them to add context to potentially misleading posts.

The Sussexes’ concerns are shared by others who fear that the absence of professional fact-checkers may lead to an increase in harmful content on Meta’s platforms.

In response to these developments, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reaffirmed their commitment to promoting accountability and safeguarding information integrity in the digital age.

They continue to support organizations advocating for online safety and are actively working to help policymakers better understand the impacts of platform design on public discourse.

Here are the key points regarding the Sussexes’ criticism of Meta over fact-checking changes:

1. Fact-Checking Program Terminated: Meta recently announced the end of its third-party fact-checking program in the U.S., replacing it with a “Community Notes” system, similar to that used by X (formerly Twitter).

2. Sussexes’ Public Criticism: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, through their Archewell Foundation, publicly condemned the decision, arguing it prioritizes profits over public safety and facilitates misinformation, hate speech, and abuse.

3. Concerns for Marginalized Communities: The couple highlighted that Meta’s reduced commitments to diversity and equity could harm marginalized communities, further enabling harmful online behaviors.

4. Mental Health Crisis Warning: They emphasized Meta’s responsibility to prevent its platforms from contributing to a global mental health crisis by enabling unchecked misinformation.

5. Profit Over Safety: The Sussexes described Meta’s move as driven by “ego or profit,” undermining its stated mission to foster connection and trust.

6. Broader Concerns Shared: Critics beyond the Sussexes also fear that eliminating professional fact-checkers will increase harmful content and misinformation.

7. Call for Policy Reversal: The couple urged Meta to reinstate protective measures and maintain accountability for its platforms’ impact on public discourse.

8. Commitment to Online Safety: Harry and Meghan reiterated their dedication to advocating for accountability and working with organizations and policymakers to ensure safe and truthful digital spaces.

The Sussexes’ critique of Meta’s decision to end its fact-checking program underscores their broader commitment to combating misinformation and fostering accountability in the digital space. By voicing their concerns, they not only highlight the potential risks of unchecked content on marginalized communities and mental health but also challenge tech giants to prioritize public safety over profits. Their stance reinforces the growing demand for ethical governance in the digital age, emphasizing the critical need for responsible platform design to ensure a safer, more inclusive online environment.

Attached is a news article regarding the sussexes going to war with meta

https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/sussexes-go-to-war-with-meta-over-changes-to-factchecking/video/43aa189808c2c508cb6c836e47cae350

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley

Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,

Donald Trump Withdraws the U.S. from the World Health Organization

In a decision that drew widespread international criticism, former U.S. President Donald Trump formally announced the United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) during his presidency in July 2020. The move, which occurred amidst the global COVID-19 pandemic, marked one of the most contentious decisions of his administration and underscored his growing skepticism of multilateral organizations.

Trump’s Justification

Trump accused the WHO of being overly influenced by China and failing to adequately respond to the COVID-19 outbreak. He alleged that the organization had “enabled” China’s lack of transparency regarding the virus’s origins and initial spread in late 2019. Trump argued that the WHO had “failed its basic duty” to act independently, labeling it a “puppet of China.”

The administration also pointed to discrepancies in the WHO’s early handling of the pandemic, such as its reluctance to declare COVID-19 a public health emergency in January 2020 and its opposition to early travel restrictions, including those imposed by the U.S.

The Financial Impact

The U.S. was the WHO’s largest single contributor, providing approximately $400 million annually—about 15% of the organization’s total budget. Trump’s withdrawal meant a significant reduction in funding at a time when the world was grappling with the worst pandemic in over a century. The decision also involved redirecting U.S. contributions to other global health initiatives, though critics argued that the abrupt withdrawal undermined international efforts to combat COVID-19.

Domestic and International Backlash

The withdrawal sparked outrage among public health experts, political opponents, and global leaders. Critics argued that the decision was politically motivated and harmful to global health efforts, particularly in low-income countries that rely heavily on WHO programs.

Domestically, Democratic lawmakers condemned the move, with then-presidential candidate Joe Biden pledging to reverse the decision if elected. Advocacy groups, including the American Medical Association, warned that cutting ties with the WHO during a pandemic could have dire consequences for global health security.

Internationally, the decision strained U.S. relations with allies and other global partners. Leaders in Europe, Asia, and Africa expressed disappointment, emphasizing the importance of a coordinated global response to the pandemic.

Reversal Under the Biden Administration

True to his campaign promise, Joe Biden reversed the withdrawal on his first day in office in January 2021. Biden signed an executive order to rejoin the WHO, reaffirming the U.S.’s commitment to global health initiatives and multilateral cooperation.

Legacy of the Decision

Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO highlighted his administration’s broader skepticism of international organizations and agreements, such as the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran nuclear deal. While some applauded his “America First” approach, others saw it as an isolationist policy that weakened the U.S.’s global leadership.

The controversy over the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO remains a key example of the polarized debate over multilateralism and the role of international organizations in addressing global challenges. Whether it was a strategic move to demand accountability or a detrimental retreat from global cooperation is a question that continues to divide opinion.

Attached is a news article regarding trump withdrawing from health organisation

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/01/21/world/world-health-organization-trump-withdraw-explainer-intl

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley