Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,
In December 2024, President-elect Donald Trump sparked international debate by suggesting that the United States should reclaim control over the Panama Canal. He criticized Panama for imposing “exorbitant” fees on American vessels and expressed concerns about potential Chinese influence over this strategic waterway.
During a speech in Arizona, Trump stated, “The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, highly unfair… This complete rip-off of our country will immediately stop.” He further warned that if Panama did not adjust its management of the canal, the U.S. would demand its return.
Panama’s President, José Raúl Mulino, responded firmly, asserting that the canal is Panamanian territory and emphasizing the nation’s sovereignty. He declared, “Every square meter of the canal and its adjacent area belongs to Panama and will continue to belong to Panama.”
The Panama Canal, completed by the U.S. in 1914, was under American control until 1999, when it was handed over to Panama following the Torrijos-Carter Treaties of 1977. These agreements were designed to recognize Panama’s sovereignty while ensuring the canal’s neutrality.
Trump’s remarks have raised concerns about potential shifts in U.S. foreign policy and the implications for international relations. Analysts note that the treaties governing the canal do not provide legal grounds for the U.S. to reclaim control unilaterally. Additionally, while a Hong Kong-based firm operates ports near the canal, there is no evidence of direct Chinese government control over the canal’s operations.
As the situation develops, it underscores the complexities of international agreements and the importance of diplomatic dialogue in addressing geopolitical concerns.
Here are the key points about Panama rejecting Donald Trump’s suggestion for the return of the Panama Canal:
1. Trump’s Proposal:
• During a speech in Arizona, Donald Trump criticized Panama’s canal toll fees as “ridiculous” and “unfair.”
• He proposed reclaiming control over the Panama Canal if Panama did not lower the costs and change its management practices.
2. Panama’s Firm Response:
• Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino categorically rejected the idea, affirming the country’s sovereignty over the canal.
• He stated that the canal is “Panamanian territory” and “non-negotiable.”
3. Historical Context:
• The U.S. controlled the Panama Canal until 1999, after which it was handed over to Panama under the Torrijos-Carter Treaties signed in 1977.
• These treaties guaranteed Panama’s sovereignty while ensuring the canal’s neutrality and open access for global trade.
4. Chinese Influence Concerns:
• Trump raised concerns about Chinese influence in the canal’s vicinity, although there is no direct evidence of Chinese government control.
• A Hong Kong-based company operates nearby ports, but analysts stress this is unrelated to the canal’s operations.
5. Legal and Geopolitical Challenges:
• International treaties provide no grounds for the U.S. to reclaim the canal unilaterally.
• Experts warn that Trump’s remarks could strain U.S.-Panama relations and escalate geopolitical tensions.
6. Global Implications:
• The Panama Canal remains a vital trade route for global commerce, making its governance a matter of international interest.
• The incident highlights the need for diplomacy and adherence to international agreements.
Attached is a news article regarding Donald trump reject of the canal in Panama
Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley
<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>
<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc
No comments:
Post a Comment