Thursday, 19 June 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Chinese PhD Student Zhenhao Zou Jailed for Drugging and Raping 10 Women in the UK

A Chinese postgraduate student, Zhenhao Zou, has been sentenced to life in prison after being found guilty of drugging and raping ten women in a horrifying string of calculated attacks across the UK.

Zou, 31, who was studying for a PhD in artificial intelligence at the University of Birmingham, lured women through online dating apps and social media. Once he gained their trust, he would invite them to his flat, where he secretly administered powerful sedatives before carrying out the rapes. Many of his victims were left unconscious, with no recollection of the attack.

Chilling Pattern of Abuse

The court heard that Zou’s crimes spanned over three years, with incidents occurring between 2021 and 2023. His victims, aged between 18 and 30, included both British and international students. Police described his methodical behaviour as “predatory and calculated,” noting that Zou often filmed the assaults and stored the footage in encrypted files on his devices.

One detective described it as “some of the most disturbing evidence we’ve encountered.” Investigators recovered dozens of videos and images, some showing Zou posing beside his unconscious victims.

How He Was Caught

Zou’s crimes came to light after one victim managed to escape his flat and reported the incident to police. A search of Zou’s residence uncovered large quantities of sedatives including benzodiazepines, along with a cache of digital evidence. The case expanded dramatically when forensic investigators managed to identify other victims from the recovered footage.

Initially denying all charges, Zou later admitted to ten counts of rape, along with multiple counts of administering a substance with intent and voyeurism. The scale of his offending shocked both the public and legal experts, with the judge branding him “a deeply dangerous individual who poses a serious threat to women.”

Sentencing and Public Response

At Birmingham Crown Court, Zou was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 25 years. Judge Samantha Griffiths said:

“This was a campaign of sexual violence driven by manipulation, deceit, and a complete disregard for human dignity. The psychological damage inflicted on your victims is immeasurable.”

The case has sparked outrage and renewed calls for stronger regulation of online dating platforms, as well as greater awareness around the dangers of drug-facilitated sexual assault.

University Response and Visa Status

The University of Birmingham confirmed that Zou had been suspended immediately upon his arrest and stated they were cooperating fully with police. The Home Office has also confirmed that due to the gravity of the crimes, Zou’s student visa has been revoked.

Support for Victims

Victim support groups praised the bravery of the women who came forward.

“Many of these women had no memory of the attack and were filled with confusion and trauma,” a spokesperson for Rape Crisis England & Wales. “Their courage has helped stop a dangerous predator.”

Police believe there may be additional victims who have not yet come forward and have urged anyone with information to contact them in confidence.

Attached is a news article regarding zou victims who he raped and drugged over 10 women 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g8dy38qxjo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Labour to Ban Choking Porn in Crackdown on Online Strangulation Content

The Labour government is set to introduce sweeping new measures aimed at banning pornographic content that depicts acts of choking or strangulation, as part of its broader effort to tackle violence against women and reform the regulation of online pornography.

The move comes amid growing concern from campaigners and MPs about the normalisation of dangerous sexual acts, particularly those that mimic or encourage non-consensual violence. Under the new proposals, any act of strangulation — regardless of whether it is presented as consensual — will be outlawed from pornographic websites accessible in the UK.

Labour’s Home Secretary has confirmed that the ban will form part of the upcoming Online Harm and Safety Bill, which aims to create clearer legal boundaries for what can and cannot be published online. Platforms hosting pornographic material will be held accountable for removing banned content or face stiff financial penalties.

“No Place for Violence in Sexual Content”

Speaking on the issue, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said:

“Choking and other forms of strangulation have no place in pornography, particularly at a time when violence against women and girls is on the rise. What is often portrayed as fantasy can fuel real-world abuse. These new laws will protect people from harmful and violent content being normalised.”

Campaigners have long warned that choking has become increasingly common in mainstream porn and even among young people engaging in sex. A 2023 report from the Women’s Equality Party found that nearly one in three women under 25 had experienced non-consensual choking during sex. Many said they felt pressured to accept it due to its portrayal in porn.

Industry Pushback and Freedom of Expression Debate

However, the ban is already facing criticism from parts of the adult entertainment industry and civil liberties advocates. Some argue that the distinction between consensual fantasy and real harm must be carefully navigated, and that a blanket ban could set a dangerous precedent for censorship.

Porn website operators, particularly those based overseas, may also challenge the UK’s jurisdiction or attempt to evade regulations through technical loopholes. Labour ministers have pledged to work closely with Ofcom and international partners to enforce compliance.

Strengthening Safeguards

The new measures will also include:

Mandatory age verification on porn sites

Clear content guidelines to block depictions of abuse, coercion, or humiliation

A duty for platforms to report illegal content to UK authorities

The choking porn ban is being hailed by women’s rights groups as a “landmark moment” in safeguarding sexual health and setting boundaries in digital spaces.

Conclusion

As Labour pushes ahead with its agenda to make the internet safer, especially for young users and vulnerable groups, the move to ban choking in pornography underscores a broader shift toward tackling misogyny and violence at its cultural roots. Whether it will stand up to legal and practical challenges remains to be seen, but the political message is clear: violence, even if sexualised, will no longer be tolerated on Britain’s screens.

Attached is a News article regarding chocking porn to be banned under labour government 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2g5qp7dwwo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36













Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Trump Approves Attack Plans on Iran—but Holds the Trigger

1. What Happened?

According to multiple reports—including The Wall Street Journal and Reuters—President Trump has privately approved military strike plans targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, notably the Fordow site, though he has not yet issued a final order to strike.

That decision is being used as leverage: the White House hopes Iran will unconditionally abandon its nuclear program, with a looming ultimatum tied to any U.S. intervention. 

2. Context & Timing

This intensifies an ongoing crisis stemming from Israeli–Iranian exchanges. Israel has carried out strikes on multiple nuclear-related targets in Iran—including Arak, Natanz, and Bushehr—meeting retaliatory Iranian missile attacks on Israeli territory, including damage to civilian infrastructure and hospitals. 

With the conflict entering a seventh day—and Iranian missiles causing Israeli casualties—Trump’s posture seeks to influence the next stage. He’s publicly stated, “I may do it. I may not do it,” underscoring his unpredictable approach. 

3. U.S. Military Posture

The U.S. has reinforced its presence in the region: a third Navy destroyer was deployed to the eastern Mediterranean, and another carrier group is moving toward the Arabian Sea. While publicly described as defensive, these moves provide options for rapid action—or could enable co‑strikes supporting Israel .

4. International Reactions

Russia has issued stern warnings against U.S. intervention, cautioning that “the world is millimeters from nuclear catastrophe” 

China, along with Russia and the UK, is calling for immediate cease-fire negotiations. 

5. Legal & Political Implications

Legal experts from the Council on Foreign Relations warn that launching military strikes absent an imminent threat could breach both international law and the War Powers Resolution—Congress may be required to approve. 

Domestically, lawmakers are pushing for clearer limits, amid concerns of U.S. escalation into a broader Middle East war .

6. What Comes Next

Iran’s response: Supreme Leader Khamenei has ruled out surrender, promising “dire consequences” for attacks. 

Diplomacy still on the table: European diplomats are pushing for nuclear talks in Geneva, and Iran has reportedly signalled some openness to negotiation—though rejecting conditional surrender .

Trump’s next steps: The key decision window is likely within the next week as Trump balances military options with the potential for diplomatic movement. 

 Bottom Line

Trump has advanced U.S. military planning against Iran as a strategic lever, not yet tipped into war. Yet by publicly approving contingencies—including deep-bunker targets like Fordow—he is ratcheting up pressure. Whether Tehran yields, or war erupts, the region’s trajectory heavily depends on Trump’s imminent decision and global diplomatic engagement.

Attached is a news article regarding Donald Trump who approves attack on Iran 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g8r8rj87vo.amp

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36









Wednesday, 18 June 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Wandsworth Prison: A Victorian Fortress Under Siege

A Crumbling Victorian Core

Built in 1851 and designed for under 1,000 inmates, Wandsworth now holds around 1,500–1,560 men, with around 80 % sharing single cells—a recipe for overcrowding, discomfort, and distress. 

Inspectors describe “crumbling flooring and furniture, broken windows, leaking fixtures,” along with persistent rodent and pigeon infestations. 

Overcrowding & Inhuman Conditions

Most inmates spend more than 22 hours per day locked in two-man cells, many without proper toilet screening or hot water. 

One wing reportedly had just 6 showers for over 140 men, and some inmates were unable to shower for up to five days. 

Facilities are filthy, with sewage smells, rats, mold, broken toilets, and patches of human waste .

Crime, Corruption & Chaos

Contraband—drugs like spice and cannabis, mobile phones, illicit alcohol—is ubiquitous. Inmates report drug use openly in cells while staff often turn a blind eye .

Staff shortages are alarming; though “fully staffed” on paper, often a third are absent daily, leading to burnout and inexperience. 

Management failures include poor prisoner roll checks (some 40 % of cell bells unanswered within five minutes), and lack of oversight leading to security lapses and even sexual misconduct. 

“Boiling Point” Living Conditions

Extreme heat compounds suffering: one inmate in December 2021 died of hyperthermia after enduring excessive cell heat—officially confirmed as a contributing factor. 

Ventilation is near non-existent, trapping hot, stale air that magnifies the feeling of oppression. A serving inmate described,

“It’s like…musty hot air hits you like a tonne of bricks…”  

These conditions, paired with overcrowding, drugs, squalor, and neglect, leave prisoners feeling like the jail is a pressure cooker at critical mass.

Crisis Outcomes: Deaths, Self-Harm & Violence

Since 2021, at least 10 self-inflicted deaths have occurred, with seven in the past 12 months, reflecting spiraling despair. 

Coroners highlighted failures in emergency response and medical care in several inmate deaths from 2018–202.

Violence is rife—nearly 1,000 assaults on staff and prisoners annually, with many reporting feeling unsafe (up to 69 % of inmates) 

Official Response & Reforms

In May 2024, HM Chief Inspector Charlie Taylor issued an “urgent notification,” labelling the prison “deeply shocking” and “catastrophic” due to leadership failures. 

The Lord Chancellor has allocated £100 million over five years, alongside deployment of specialist staff and improved security systems. 

Some refurbishment has begun—new windows, roof repairs, unused health centre, and enhanced suicide/self-harm training. 

However, watchdogs warn improvements are slow, some issues remain unresolved, and real change requires experienced, permanent leadership .

Analysis: Has the “Boiling Point” Been Reached?

Absolutely. Between extreme temperatures, overcrowded squalor, drug-fueled disorder, and ignored emergencies, Wandsworth Prison has reached a humanitarian crisis. The death of an inmate from hyperthermia underscores how environmental neglect can be fatal. While reforms and funding are steps in the right direction, the crisis is systemic and will demand sustained, structural change—not just superficial upgrades.

Looking Ahead: What Needs Fixing

To avert further tragedies, Wandsworth must:

1. Drastically reduce overcrowding—no more doubling up in single cells.

2. Ensure functional heating, ventilation, and hygiene systems.

3. Strengthen staffing—retain experienced guards and fill vacancies.

4. Improve security to eradicate contraband inflows.

5. Revamp training and emergency response, especially in healthcare and mental health.

6. Hold leadership accountable until standards are sustainably met.

Wandsworth Prison stands as a stark case study of neglect, overcrowding, and systemic failure—the high-pressure environment has indeed reached boiling point. Whether new funding and reforms can cool the crisis remains to be seen, but the current trajectory demands nothing less than urgent, comprehensive action.

References: Reporting includes HMIP inspection (May 2024), government announcements, ombudsman inquest (Dec 2021), inmate testimonies, and multiple media investigations detailing the extent and severity of the crisis.

Attached is a artcle regarding Wandsworth prison and the pressure it is facing 

https://putney.news/2025/05/07/shut-it-down-wandsworth-prison-in-crisis-again/

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36














Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Outrage Grows Over Welfare Bill Cuts Targeting Disabled People in the UK

The UK government is facing mounting criticism following its announcement of sweeping welfare cuts, with disabled people expected to bear the brunt of the austerity measures. The new Welfare Reform Bill, unveiled this week, proposes significant reductions in support for disability benefits, sparking concern among charities, opposition MPs, and human rights advocates.

Under the proposed legislation, cuts will affect Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), and the mobility element of Universal Credit. The government claims the reforms are designed to “streamline the system” and “incentivise independence,” but critics argue it’s a thinly veiled attempt to balance the budget at the expense of the most vulnerable.

Key Changes in the Welfare Bill

Stricter assessments for PIP: Many with “invisible” or fluctuating disabilities may no longer qualify.

Reduction of ESA rates: The support group rate is set to be cut by up to £30 a week for new claimants.

Mobility support limits: Some claimants will lose access to vehicles provided through the Motability scheme.

Cap on total disability-related benefits: A new upper limit will prevent claimants from receiving more than a certain amount monthly, regardless of need.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has defended the cuts, stating they aim to “focus help on those most in need” and reduce long-term dependency on state support. However, disability advocacy groups such as Scope and Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) have accused the government of “targeting those who can least fight back.”

Voices from the Disabled Community

Emma Donnelly, 42, from Manchester, who suffers from multiple sclerosis, told reporters:

“I rely on PIP to afford my wheelchair and get to my medical appointments. If that’s taken away, I don’t know how I’ll survive. It’s like they’re punishing us for being ill.”

Other critics warn that the mental health toll of the changes could be severe. A 2022 study linked past disability benefit reassessments to increased rates of suicide and hospitalisation. “These reforms could have deadly consequences,” said Dr. Paul Farmer, CEO of Mind.

Political Fallout

Labour leader Angela Rayner has vowed to oppose the bill in Parliament, calling it “a shameful assault on dignity and equality.” The SNP and Liberal Democrats have also condemned the proposals, while some backbench Conservative MPs have expressed discomfort with the harshness of the reforms.

Amid protests planned in major cities and a petition garnering over 500,000 signatures in just two days, the government is under pressure to reconsider or at least revise the bill’s harsher elements.

Conclusion

As the Welfare Reform Bill moves through the Commons, the debate over how the UK treats its disabled citizens has reignited. For many, this is not just a policy issue—it’s about basic human rights. The coming weeks may determine whether the government listens to those pleading for compassion, or continues down a path many are calling cruel and unjust.

Attached is a news article regarding welfare cuts to disabled benefits reform 

https://news.sky.com/story/battle-to-convince-mps-to-back-benefit-cuts-to-more-than-three-million-households-13385195

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 


<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36




















Tuesday, 17 June 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

The Unlikely Face-Off of Two Notorious Women

Joanna Dennehy and Rose West are the only two women in the UK serving whole-life sentences—Dennehy for murdering three men during a frenzied ten-day spree in 2013–14 (with two attempted murders)  , and West for the torture and murder of at least ten women and girls alongside her husband Fred between 1973 and 1987. 

When Prison Walls Concealed Mortality

The Arrival at HMP Bronzefield (2014)

Dennehy’s Threat: Within 5–20 minutes of arriving at Bronzefield, Dennehy coldly announced she was going to kill “that bitch” — referring to Rose West. 

West’s Rapid Transfer: Prisons swiftly placed West in solitary, then transferred her out to neutralize the threat. 

Transfer to HMP Low Newton (2019)

The recent arrival of Dennehy at Low Newton reignited tensions. Dennehy allegedly said, “Send me there and I’ll f—ing kill Rose West,” forcing West to be relocated again.

Motivations Behind the Plot

Claiming Dominance: Criminologists believe Dennehy saw West’s notoriety as a challenge to her own image. By targeting West, Dennehy aimed to become Britain’s most feared female murderer. 

Hierarchy in Prisons: In maximum‑security settings, reputation equates to power—and Dennehy wanted to assert herself at the top. 

Professor David Wilson noted this was part of Dennehy’s ongoing “power play” to be seen as the country’s most dangerous female killer. 

The Escape Plan: A Nightmare in Planning

Biometric Finger Plot: Dennehy drafted a gruesome plan: kill a guard, sever their finger, and use it to bypass biometric locks in a bid to break out. Authorities uncovered the plan before it could be executed.

 Personality Revealed

Remorseless and Sadistic: Dennehy confessed murder had become “more-ish” and “fun,” seeing it as a test of her own coldness. 

Alluring Manipulation: She exploited relationships with guards and inmates, using sex and charm to manipulate others. 

Clinical Psychopathy: Diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder and paraphilia sadomasochism (deriving pleasure from inflicting pain), Dennehy was described by one criminologist as “pure evil”—even smelling of it. 

Prison Authorities Respond

West’s safety hinged on moves away from where Dennehy was held—including solitary confinement and transfers to different prisons. 

Dennehy, meanwhile, has spent time in solitary and secure units, but has continued manipulative behavior, including relationships behind bars. 

The Broader Significance

Female Killers in Focus: Dennehy and West have shattered stereotypes—rare female offenders whose extreme violence challenges societal perceptions. 

Power and Reputation: Prisons aren’t immune to hierarchies; inmates like Dennehy exploit fear and infamy to seize control. 

Conclusion

Joanna Dennehy’s plot against Rose West wasn’t mere bravado—it was a calculated move driven by ambition, hatred, and notoriety. From threats of murder to biometrically-armed prison breaks, her tactics illustrate a rare brand of female psychopathy, one that thrives on power, brutality, and control.

Meanwhile, Rose West remains isolated in HMP New Hall, shielded from further threats by the prison system’s strict segregation measures.

This clash of Britain’s two most infamous women behind bars is a grim reminder that even within prison walls, status—sometimes secured with violence—still rules.

Attached is a news article regarding the plot to kill rose west by uk most dangerous in prison Joanna dennehy 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36








Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Should the UK Decriminalise Abortion? A Nation Divided on a Critical Issue

Introduction

The debate over abortion laws in the United Kingdom has reignited in recent months, with growing calls from campaigners, politicians, and healthcare professionals to fully decriminalise abortion. Currently, abortion remains a criminal offence under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, although it is permitted under specific conditions set out in the 1967 Abortion Act. Now, with shifting public opinion and evolving views on reproductive rights, the question arises: should the UK decriminalise abortion entirely. 

The Current Law

Under existing legislation in England, Scotland, and Wales, abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks if approved by two doctors and carried out in licensed clinics. Beyond 24 weeks, it is only permitted under extreme circumstances, such as severe fetal abnormalities or threats to the mother’s life. Northern Ireland, despite recent reforms, still faces more restrictions compared to the rest of the UK.

Importantly, abortion remains technically a criminal offence unless it meets the narrow criteria—meaning a woman who procures an abortion outside these legal bounds can face up to life in prison.

Arguments for Decriminalisation

Campaigners for reform argue that criminalising abortion is outdated and harmful. They point out that:

Autonomy and Human Rights: A woman’s right to make decisions about her own body should not be a criminal matter. Many see abortion access as a fundamental human right.

Stigma and Fear: Criminal laws around abortion contribute to stigma, shame, and fear, especially for women in vulnerable situations.

Modern Medicine and Ethics: Medical professionals now regard abortion as a healthcare issue rather than a criminal one. Keeping it under criminal law is seen by many as incompatible with best medical practice.

Global Trends: Countries like Canada, New Zealand, and parts of Australia have decriminalised abortion with no rise in unsafe terminations. These examples are often cited as models for reform.

Arguments Against Decriminalisation

Opponents of decriminalisation, including some religious groups, pro-life advocates, and conservative politicians, argue:

Moral and Ethical Concerns: They believe removing criminal penalties sends the wrong moral message and undermines the sanctity of life.

Potential for Abuse: Without legal safeguards, there are fears of increased late-term abortions or unsafe, unregulated procedures.

Public Division: While many support abortion rights, full decriminalisation remains controversial, with surveys suggesting the public supports limits and oversight.

What Decriminalisation Could Look Like

If decriminalised, abortion would be regulated as a healthcare procedure, much like any other medical service. Women would not risk prosecution for terminating pregnancies outside current legal parameters. Doctors would operate under professional standards rather than criminal threat. However, safeguards—such as gestational limits and counselling services—could still be in place to ensure responsible access.

Conclusion

The push to decriminalise abortion in the UK reflects wider shifts in societal attitudes and women’s rights advocacy. Supporters argue it’s time to remove Victorian-era laws and treat abortion purely as a healthcare matter. Opponents warn of moral decline and the risks of deregulation. As Parliament debates the issue, Britain faces a defining moment in its approach to reproductive freedom. Whether or not change comes soon, one thing is certain: the conversation is far from over.

Attached is a news article regarding should abortion be decriminalise 

https://news.sky.com/story/abortion-debate-reignited-as-sky-poll-reveals-publics-view-on-decriminalisation-ahead-of-commons-vote-13384763

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36















Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Murder Probe Launched After Woman Found Dead Following House Explosion

A murder investigation is underway after a woman was found dead in the aftermath of a devastating explosion at her home.

Emergency services rushed to the scene shortly after 7:00 AM on Monday morning following reports of a loud blast that shook the residential street. Firefighters battled fierce flames as thick smoke poured from the property, with neighbours evacuated as a precaution.

Once the blaze was brought under control, crews discovered the body of a woman—believed to be in her 40s—inside the severely damaged home. Police have since confirmed her death is being treated as suspicious and a murder probe has been launched.

The identity of the woman has not yet been released, pending formal identification and notification of next of kin.

Forensic teams remain at the scene, combing through the wreckage to determine the cause of the explosion and whether accelerants or other incendiary devices may have been used. Detectives say they are keeping an open mind but believe the blast may have been deliberately triggered.

A spokesperson for the local police force said:

“We are currently treating this as a murder inquiry. Our thoughts are with the victim’s family during this incredibly difficult time. A full investigation is underway, and we are appealing for anyone who saw or heard anything unusual in the area early this morning to come forward.”

Neighbours have expressed shock at the incident, describing the woman as quiet and friendly.

“The whole house just blew up. The windows shattered, and we felt the shockwave down the road. It’s terrifying,” said one local resident.

Police have not confirmed whether any arrests have been made but urged the public not to speculate as inquiries continue.

Attached is a news article regarding a murder probe as women is found dead after explosion at her home 

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/gas-explosion-stoke-newington-murder-b1233286.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36






Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Fugitives Wanted for Murder and Abuse Granted Right to Work in Britain

A number of foreign fugitives wanted for serious crimes, including murder and child abuse, have reportedly been granted the right to work in the United Kingdom, sparking public outrage and renewed calls for urgent reform of the immigration and asylum system.

According to leaked Home Office files and an ongoing investigation by multiple media outlets, at least six individuals wanted by police or Interpol in their home countries were allowed to remain in Britain after applying for asylum. Despite red alerts on their criminal pasts, they were later issued work permits and, in some cases, even given housing assistance.

Serious Offences Ignored

Among the fugitives are:

A Somali national wanted for a 2017 triple murder in Mogadishu who is now working in a warehouse in the Midlands.

A Pakistani man accused of running a child sex trafficking ring in Lahore, now employed as a delivery driver in Manchester.

An Albanian gang member sought for organised violence and drug trafficking, who has been living and working in the UK under a new identity since 2022.

These individuals have managed to exploit loopholes in Britain’s asylum and legal aid system, claiming persecution or mistreatment in their home countries. Some cases were complicated by the Home Office’s inability to obtain criminal records or verify documents due to unstable foreign administrations or lack of data-sharing agreements.

Border Force and Intelligence Failures

Experts say the problem lies in the UK’s fragmented immigration enforcement and outdated vetting systems. One senior Border Force officer, speaking anonymously, said:

“We have flagged individuals who came through illegal routes or with incomplete documentation, yet political pressure to process asylum claims quickly means many cases don’t get full security checks.”

Meanwhile, the National Crime Agency (NCA) and Interpol have voiced frustration over the UK’s apparent reluctance to extradite some of these individuals, citing human rights concerns in their countries of origin.

Political Fallout

The revelations have caused an uproar in Parliament. Home Secretary Sarah Dines is under pressure to explain how fugitives could slip through the cracks and obtain legal work status. Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper slammed the government, saying:

“This is a shocking failure of national security. How can wanted murderers and abusers be handed access to jobs and services while law-abiding British citizens face endless vetting and red tape?”

Government Response

The Home Office issued a brief statement saying it does not comment on individual cases but insisted that all asylum seekers undergo “strict background checks.” Officials acknowledged, however, that some applicants are “difficult to vet due to limited data-sharing with their home nations.”

A fast-tracked review of the vetting procedures for asylum seekers is reportedly underway, and deportation proceedings for several individuals are now being reconsidered.

Conclusion

The situation highlights a dangerous loophole in the UK’s immigration and asylum system — one that could be exploited by those fleeing justice rather than persecution. As political pressure mounts, the government now faces urgent questions over how Britain can maintain its humanitarian obligations without compromising public safety.

Attached is a news article regarding the Brazilian fugitives wanted for murder and child rape are given right to live in Britain wanted in Brazil 

https://www.itv.com/news/2025-06-16/fugitives-wanted-for-murder-and-child-rape-given-right-to-live-in-britain

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36











Monday, 16 June 2025

Smileband News


Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband, 

Claire’s Courage: Living with a Brain Tumour and Inspiring Others Through Adversity

Claire’s story is one of unimaginable strength in the face of life’s most difficult challenges. A mother, partner, and community volunteer, Claire was living an ordinary life until she began experiencing persistent headaches and episodes of dizziness. After months of uncertainty, fatigue, and medical appointments, Claire was diagnosed with a brain tumour — a life-altering moment that would come to define her resilience.

The Diagnosis

Claire’s symptoms at first seemed innocuous — tiredness, occasional memory lapses, and blurry vision. “I thought I was just overworked,” she said. But as the symptoms worsened, her instincts told her something wasn’t right. A scan confirmed the devastating news: she had a brain tumour pressing against her frontal lobe.

“I didn’t even hear what the doctor said at first,” Claire recalls. “The word tumour just echoed in my head. My whole world stopped.”

Doctors determined the tumour was benign but located in a sensitive area that made treatment complicated. Surgery was possible, but risky. Claire was faced with a heartbreaking choice — undergo an operation with uncertain results, or try to manage her condition through medication and monitoring.

A New Chapter

Despite the fear and physical toll, Claire chose to fight back — not only for herself, but for her two young children. Her days soon became filled with medical appointments, scans, consultations, and medication regimens. Her husband, Mark, became her rock, taking on more responsibilities at home and becoming her full-time carer.

But Claire refused to let the diagnosis define her. In between hospital visits, she began documenting her journey on social media to raise awareness about brain tumours, especially among women. “It’s not always cancer,” she explains. “But it is serious. And too many people ignore the signs.”

Her courage caught the attention of local newspapers and charities. She has since become a voice for those living with “invisible illnesses,” speaking at fundraising events and advocating for earlier detection and better support for families.

Living with Uncertainty

Every six months, Claire undergoes MRI scans to monitor the tumour. While stable for now, the tumour remains inoperable. She lives with headaches, occasional vision loss, and cognitive fog, but remains determined not to let the illness steal her spirit.

“I have good days and I have bad days. But I’ve learned to treasure the little things — a walk in the park, a hug from my kids, a cup of tea in silence. That’s what matters.”

Claire also works with The Brain Tumour Charity to help others navigate diagnosis and treatment. “I want people to know they’re not alone. You don’t have to hide your pain. There’s strength in vulnerability.”

A Message of Hope

Claire’s story is one of persistence, love, and the power of community. Though her battle is ongoing, she continues to shine as a beacon of hope for many who face uncertain futures. Her words resonate beyond her own illness: “Even in darkness, we can choose to be a light for others.”

If you’ve been affected by a brain tumour or want to support others like Claire, contact The Brain Tumour Charity or visit your local health centre for support and information.

Attached is a news article regarding Claire who has a brain tumour 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14816291/contraceptive-brain-tumour-depo-provera-headaches-diagnosed.html

Article written and configured by Christopher Stanley 

<!-- Google tag (gtag.js) --> <script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-XDGJVZXVQ4"></script> <script> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'G-XDGJVZXVQ4'); </script>


<script src="https://cdn-eu.pagesense.io/js/smilebandltd/45e5a7e3cddc4e92ba91fba8dc


894500L65WEHZ4XKDX36










Smileband News

Dear 222 News viewers, sponsored by smileband,  Chinese PhD Student Zhenhao Zou Jailed for Drugging and Raping 10 Women in the UK A Chinese ...